Romney has withdrawn and asked his delegates to support McCain.
1 posted on
02/14/2008 10:33:36 AM PST by
Robbin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Robbin
2 posted on
02/14/2008 10:34:22 AM PST by
Matchett-PI
(Romney will get the VP nod if I have anything to do with it.)
To: Robbin
There goes that brokered convention...
3 posted on
02/14/2008 10:34:45 AM PST by
cdbull23
("If it's brown, drink it down. If it's black, send it back." - Homer on what's good to drink.)
To: Robbin; Checkers
To: Robbin
5 posted on
02/14/2008 10:34:48 AM PST by
ninergold3
(Don't like my attitude? Then get one of your own!)
To: Robbin
Huckabee shouldn’t have crossed the line with the “Jesus and the Devil are brothers” crap.
6 posted on
02/14/2008 10:34:59 AM PST by
krb
(If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
To: Robbin
One step further away from a brokered convention, correct?
7 posted on
02/14/2008 10:35:03 AM PST by
mysterio
To: Robbin
Well how do ya Romney backers feel about your boy now?
To: Robbin
Good news.
Maybe Huckabee can extend his time in the Cayman Islands to include some sailing.
(My bad! ;-) )
To: Robbin
11 posted on
02/14/2008 10:35:29 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
To: Robbin
With this move, I disagree. I’m a huge “Mitt”en...but I just can’t stomach McCain. However, I’m sure Romney has his eye on 2012, just like Reagan had his eye on 1980 in ‘76.
12 posted on
02/14/2008 10:35:42 AM PST by
IMissPresidentReagan
("Don't give up your ideals, don't compromise, don't turn to expediency..."Ronald Reagan, 1976)
To: Robbin
Liberal birds of a feather. Mitt looked at Juan and looked at Huck and thought... “hmmm...Juan is more liberal...I’ll throw my support behind him.”
13 posted on
02/14/2008 10:35:43 AM PST by
big'ol_freeper
(REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
To: Robbin
Do you have a link for that?
To: Robbin
Well, we all knew what a “conservative” Romney was... /s
To: Robbin
This would give McCain 1,131 delegates, 60 short of what is needed for the nomination.
18 posted on
02/14/2008 10:36:06 AM PST by
squidly
To: Robbin
Good career move for the principled conservative.
To: Robbin
Romney can’t give many of them away. They are bound to vote for him at least thru the first ballot. It varies state by state.
21 posted on
02/14/2008 10:37:16 AM PST by
kabar
To: Robbin
22 posted on
02/14/2008 10:37:21 AM PST by
RDTF
(kill the terrorists, punch the hippies)
To: Robbin
Enough of this nonsense. Get the Huckster out and let unify to destroy the Hildebeast or the Cokehead.
To: Robbin
24 posted on
02/14/2008 10:37:32 AM PST by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson