Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
AP ^ | 02-14-2008 | AP

Posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:45 AM PST by montag813

WASHINGTON - U.S. officials say the Pentagon is planning to shoot down a broken spy satellite expected to hit the Earth in early March.

This is the U.S. military will use a missile to destroy a satellite in space, NBC News reports.

The spy satellite has lost all power and is expected to crash back on earth in early March, spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; bmd; dod; interceptor; lockheed; missile; missiledefense; nasa; pentagon; raytheon; satellite; sm3; usn; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-142 next last
To: montag813
Well, personally, I think they should send up some of those prisoners you see in orange jumpsuits along the roadways, and have them pick up the pieces and put them in these...


81 posted on 02/14/2008 10:17:23 AM PST by papasmurf (Calm down! I've got Greenspan's book, you jerk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
WThePrez: all ur sats are belong to us

ChiComsgoMaoMao: Hay! That R saying!
82 posted on 02/14/2008 10:22:42 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (Islam ... If you can't join them, beat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: montag813

With China’s successful shoot-down of their own satellite, what will be the public-relations and security ramifications if we miss?


83 posted on 02/14/2008 10:25:22 AM PST by Washi (Support the country you live in, or go live in the country you support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

yes we can


84 posted on 02/14/2008 10:27:58 AM PST by larryjohnson (FReepersonaltrainer,USAF(Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
One of the reasons that the government said that they would shoot it down is to prevent the hydrzine on board from getting into the atmosphere. Hydrazine was used on some military aircraft and is some really nasty stuff.

From Wikopedia "Hydrazine is highly toxic and dangerously unstable, especially in the anhydrous form. Symptoms of acute exposure to high levels of hydrazine in humans may include irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, dizziness, headache, nausea, pulmonary edema, seizures, coma, and it can also damage the liver, kidneys, and central nervous system. The liquid is corrosive and may produce dermatitis from skin contact in humans and animals. Effects to the lungs, liver, spleen, and thyroid have been reported in animals chronically exposed to hydrazine via inhalation. Increased incidences of lung, nasal cavity, and liver tumors have been observed in rodents exposed to hydrazine."

If the fuel tank survived reentry and landed in a major city or water supply, it would be a very bad thing.

85 posted on 02/14/2008 10:28:40 AM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

That sounds like fun. We can choose up sides and even bet on them.


86 posted on 02/14/2008 10:31:09 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

Based on the nature of the satellite, I would presume that that is classified info.


87 posted on 02/14/2008 10:31:56 AM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

Depends where on its orbital decay it gets blown to pieces. The idea is to catch it on the way down so the pieces burn up during further reentry.


88 posted on 02/14/2008 10:35:02 AM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Wow, looks like I actually guessed correctly at the likely weapons system.

Yep. You get a gold star on your report card...

89 posted on 02/14/2008 10:35:45 AM PST by null and void (President Hillary!™ Clinton? Time to invest in body bags. Again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: montag813

wasnt a crashed satellite the reason that the dead rose in night of the living dead?

Those who dont remember history and all that....


90 posted on 02/14/2008 10:38:09 AM PST by Armedanddangerous (Chuin, Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
IMHO, they have calculated the trajectory and believe that the satellite has a high likelihood of either hitting a densely populated area or landing where in the back yard of someone they don’t want having even a remote chance of gaining from the technology.

For these reasons, they will shoot it down in a way that improves the odds of less damage and non-recovery.

91 posted on 02/14/2008 10:44:47 AM PST by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

It’s been a lot of years since I read that book. I do recall that the stealth fighter was nicknamed the “frisbee” because of its smooth, curved lines, showing that Clancy bought a lot of the disinformation most of the world did at the time. And IIRC, the F-15 satellite-killer pilot was a woman; I remember a line about how with the fifth kill, she became the first USAF ace.


92 posted on 02/14/2008 10:48:02 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

There is some critical stuff on board that could survive reentry and land in someone’s back yard. Or could be retrieved by someone, like the Russians. Just a guess.


93 posted on 02/14/2008 10:51:17 AM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
first female USAF ace.
94 posted on 02/14/2008 10:53:49 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
IMHO, they have calculated the trajectory and believe that the satellite has a high likelihood of either hitting a densely populated area or landing where in the back yard of someone they don’t want having even a remote chance of gaining from the technology.

At this point about one month from orbital decay, it is virtually impossible to guess where on earth an uncontrolled decaying satellite will ultimately come in. There are too many variables one of which is solar activity which is highly variable and extremely important in the ultimate timing of final orbit decay.
95 posted on 02/14/2008 10:53:53 AM PST by plsvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Very foolish.


96 posted on 02/14/2008 10:54:39 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

Shooting down the satellite should be a piece of cake given its size.

Or this can be a MDO P.R. nightmare...


97 posted on 02/14/2008 10:59:15 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

No,
but who ever were the contractors that put this thing into space need to have the agreement pulled, and they given the space boot. they probably had a hidden “de-orbitalizer” device that slowly slunk it out of orbit towards a fiery death, and hopefully into a rationale of future contract endeavors of satellite replacement.

Contractor: “ust be global warning, or solar winds or something.”

Govt rep.: “Hmmmm.”

Contractor: “We will look into it. Sign here for the replacement contract and we will have it up in a jiffy.”

Govt rep.: “Hmmm. (i’m hungry for cornbread for some reason.)


98 posted on 02/14/2008 11:03:17 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
I would think -- and I admit I'm no physicist -- that it would depend in what direction it's hit. If it's hit directly from below, that might blow the debris back upward.

Yes, but even so, the point of impact would be part of the new orbit, and it would be down low in the atmosphere. So the pieces would deorbit relatively quickly.

99 posted on 02/14/2008 11:22:13 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

“It’s been a lot of years since I read that book. I do recall that the stealth fighter was nicknamed the “frisbee” because of its smooth, curved lines, showing that Clancy bought a lot of the disinformation most of the world did at the time. And IIRC, the F-15 satellite-killer pilot was a woman; I remember a line about how with the fifth kill, she became the first USAF ace.”

Yeah. The stealth mentioned in his book was based off of one of those Lockheed concept drawings from the late 70’s to early 80’s that were part of the ATF design.


100 posted on 02/14/2008 11:23:50 AM PST by 2CAVTrooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson