Yes, but they want the defeat to go down in history on the shoulders of a Republican, just like how they blamed Nixon because the troops came home under his watch even though it was LBJ who screwed up Vietnam. They know that if the troops come home defeated under their watch, history will show it was they who were defeated, not President Bush. Look at Vietnam, as I mentioned, opposite parties, but same possible scenario. LBJ screwed it up, but Nixon was blamed because he had the final watch.
They've already assigned historical fault and are now in the process of inculcating it into the public mind:
. . . the same Washington game . . .
Its a game where the only way for Democrats to look tough on national security is by talking, and acting and voting like Bush-McCain Republicans, while our troops are sent to fight tour after tour of duty in a war that shouldve never been authorized and shouldve never been waged. Thats what happens when we use 9/11 to scare up votes, and thats why we need to do more than end a war we need to end the mindset that got us into war.
Thats the choice in this primary. Its about whether we choose to play the game, or whether we choose to end it; its change that polls well, or change we can believe in; its the past versus the future. And when Im the Democratic nominee for President that will be the choice in November. -- Senator Obama's Victory Speech in Madison, WI