The ONLY Huck policy that is NOT liberal is his pro-life stand.
Given the lack of impact from the oval office on this subject, there is no point in voting for Huck.
The author’s assertion that Rush and Sean are taking these positions for ratings is arguably a lie in itself, since it is provable that Rush and Sean’s positions are heartfelt, ideological, and thoroughly expressed positions.
How do you answer the view that Huck’s liberalism in AR is a result of AR’s long-time liberalism. It was liberalism demanded by liberals at the STATE level, but he would not necessarily be liberal at the national level.