Skip to comments.
Should Conservatives Rebel? [Rush]
The Rush Limbaugh Show ^
| 13 February 2008
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 02/13/2008 6:38:54 PM PST by COBOL2Java
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-300 next last
To: COBOL2Java
It’s 1992 all over again. Stupid conservatives will hand the White House to the DEMs. This time it won’t even require a Perot.
2
posted on
02/13/2008 6:45:51 PM PST
by
Huck
(Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
To: COBOL2Java
RUSH: "I just know that a lot of things can change, particularly emotionally, from now through November."This is what people are missing when it comes to Rush. Rush was counting on Rudy to gain the nomination and Rudy's loss has been very difficult for Rush to emotionally accept. However, as he says, he's smart enough to know that his emotions will likely change between now and November.
He'll be rooting for McCain in the fall. He'll be a big help to the GOP.
3
posted on
02/13/2008 6:46:11 PM PST
by
tear gas
(Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
To: COBOL2Java
Rush endorsing Clinton, bah humbug. Haas he seen her "testicle lock box"?
Endorse your cat. But, Rebel On! I'm voting for Baracko if Rush endorses that woman, Mrs. Clinton.
4
posted on
02/13/2008 6:46:35 PM PST
by
harpo11
(Any One But Hillary Even Captain Kangaroo, Mr. Moose, Larry, Moe & Curly Would Do)
To: COBOL2Java
Should conservatives rebel? too late for that question, we already are!
Now when it comes to voting in the general election, I think it's up to the individual as to what they want to do. I plan to NOT vote FOR McCain, assuming he's the nominee. I also wouldn't vote FOR Huckabee.
Basically I don't have a puppy in this fight.
But the thing is whether anyone plans to vote or not...WE HAVE TO MAKE THE FARKING RINO'S BELIEVE WERE NOT GONNA VOTE!
Scare the beejeebus outta them!
The main thing is to focus on local, state and US congressional offices. Get conservatives in those offices and the presidency will take care of itself.
prisoner6
5
posted on
02/13/2008 6:49:02 PM PST
by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
To: COBOL2Java
the first one is McCain-Feingold But I'm betting the idiot caller voted for the president who signed that bill.
6
posted on
02/13/2008 6:50:25 PM PST
by
Huck
(Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
To: Huck
ditto.
i’m tired of this.
i don’t want either hill or bama in the white house.
7
posted on
02/13/2008 6:52:57 PM PST
by
ken21
( people die + you never hear from them again.)
To: COBOL2Java
I'm one of those conservatives who does not like McCain mostly because he called people like me names because we disagreed with him on immigration. So it's very difficult to consider voting for him What a whining baby. Sheesh. I never realized how spoiled and immature so many conservatives are.
8
posted on
02/13/2008 6:53:33 PM PST
by
Huck
(Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
To: Huck
It seems like the old Rush is back. I actually stopped listening for the most part because he was becoming too Hannity-like (ie no matter what, GOP=good, DNC=bad... ok, I agree with that last part). I grew up listening to Limbaugh, and it formed my ideaology. Not because I prefer Team Red to Team Blue, but because it just seemed like such common sense. Money is good... guns protect freedom... a human being has rights, even if it’s still in the womb... freedom requires responsibility... we cannot be the global love cops and solve the world’s problems... borders aren’t just invisible lines on a map. Just like Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” speech, it all holds just as true today as it did then.
9
posted on
02/13/2008 6:53:50 PM PST
by
Rob112586
("...a decrease in the quantity of legislation generally means an increase in the quality of life.")
To: COBOL2Java
I don't think the Republican Party has the slightest idea how much of this kind of unrest there is out there.
I don't think the Republican Party cares....They showed conservatives that they don't think that conservatives' support is NOT necessary to select a candidate. They don't care if we vote or don't vote in the general election. They assume we'll get in line because we cannot stomach the alternative. What they don't realize is that some of us will not be made to choose between two unacceptable choices. If there is not a third party, we can write someone in. It is not conservatives who need Republicans, but the other way around.
10
posted on
02/13/2008 6:53:51 PM PST
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("Don’t give up your ideals, don’t compromise, don’t turn to expediency..."Ronald Reagan, 1976)
To: harpo11
I'm voting for Baracko if Rush endorses that woman, Mrs. Clinton. So basically you are saying what Limbaugh does will determine how you vote.
You're a real strong-minded independent sort, huh?
To: COBOL2Java
No Quarter!
12
posted on
02/13/2008 6:54:13 PM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: tear gas
Rush was counting on Rudy to gain the nomination and Rudy's loss has been very difficult for Rush to emotionally accept. That has to be the silliest statement I have read in along time, your turbin is on to tight "Carnac".
13
posted on
02/13/2008 6:54:24 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: COBOL2Java
No Quarter!
14
posted on
02/13/2008 6:54:48 PM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: tear gas
Rush was counting on Rudy to gain the nomination and Rudy's loss has been very difficult for Rush to emotionally accept. That has to be the silliest statement I have read in a long time, your turbin is on to tight "Carnac".
15
posted on
02/13/2008 6:54:53 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: harpo11
I'm voting for Baracko if Rush endorses that woman, Mrs. Clinton. So basically you are saying what Limbaugh does will determine how you vote.
You're a real strong-minded independent sort, huh?
To: Huck
But I'm betting the idiot caller voted for the president who signed that bill. Yep, all us idiots who won't vote for McCain. And all the McCainiacs are sooooo much smarter than us!
17
posted on
02/13/2008 6:55:00 PM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(Vote for McCain! Mental health is overrated!)
To: COBOL2Java
Buchannan rebeled and got what? Less than 2% of the vote? People need to deal with the fact that if there’s not enough of them to win a primary, there’s not of them to win an election. The problem with two party politics in the age of consolodated media is that you’re always voting for the lesser of two evils.
To: Huck
Hmmmm...2 posts and you've called conservatives "stupid" and "idiot", and yet you're dumbfounded as to why we don't want to vote with people who think of us in those terms.
Could it be you're getting worried we AREN'T gonna be lapdogs to anybody who votes for a candidate just because they have an "R" beside their name?
prisoner6
19
posted on
02/13/2008 6:55:36 PM PST
by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
To: tear gas
Rush was counting on Rudy to gain the nomination and Rudy's loss has been very difficult for Rush to emotionally accept. That has to be the silliest statement I have read in a long time, your turbin is on to tight "Carnac".
20
posted on
02/13/2008 6:56:05 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-300 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson