Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LadyNavyVet
That's true, but since 2006 the party leadership seems to be MIA. Still, they don't pick the candidates. If a viable conservative candidate had emerged, the nomination was his for the taking. Can't blame the party for that, can't really blame anyone. Though it would have been nice to still have Santorum and Allen in the mix.

If, and I think it's still an if, it's Obama, things could change. Obama has a lot of problems on the issues, and likely some mysteries yet to arise from his Illinois legislature experience, McCain is simply going to have to make that point.

83 posted on 02/13/2008 6:58:23 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

I think a lot of the viable candidates saw the handwriting on the wall. Just look at all the Pubbie congresscritters who are calling it quits. That doesn’t happen in an election year when they expect the party to do well. And if we have to have a sacrifical lamb this year, I can’t get too broken up if McCain’s it.

Obama’s strength is that he doesn’t have a past to run against, and McCain does. He’s an empty vessel into which people can pour their particular hopes, dreams and frustrations. He’ll also have his base sewn up and will be able to play to the middle. I expect him to pick a reasuring white male centrist for veep to help him do that.

Unless McCain and the party are at the top of their game, he’s going to be hard to beat.


92 posted on 02/13/2008 8:06:43 AM PST by LadyNavyVet (“I will offer a choice, not an echo.” Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson