Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Accuses Obama of Cutting Deals With Contributor
ABC News ^ | Feb. 11, 2008 | ELOISE HARPER and TAHMAN BRADLEY

Posted on 02/12/2008 3:50:26 PM PST by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: COUNTrecount

A criminal calling a crook, corrupt. Rich, isn’t it?


21 posted on 02/12/2008 4:38:45 PM PST by do not press 2 for spanish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Hey, Hillary would never cut a deal. ;-)


22 posted on 02/12/2008 4:43:15 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Yes, Ann! Exactly! You can always tell of which The Grifters are guilty—it’s about whichever they finger-point.


23 posted on 02/12/2008 4:46:39 PM PST by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The Clinton's have long accused others of the very things that they are most guilty of. It is part of their psychological makeup. The transference make them feel better, makes them feel justified, and has worked well in the past for them, as to distraction, blowing from behind a smokescreen of their own vehement denials.
Of course, we know that a Clinton "denial", doesn't mean squat. They've yet to fess up to ANYTHING, even when caught red-handed, and totally exposed!

The perky Katy Curic types are the chief enablers, but then again, the democrat party electorate chime in, and echo everything the Soros media Inc., trickle into the info streams, too. Uncritically, reflexidly, and without pause...

Notice that she says that all her funds have been converted into cash --- and claims that makes her "clean", and without conflict of interest, attempting to blunt what she knows is coming. She knows she is weak in this area, and is attempting to inoculate herself, while giving her opponent a dose, of one of the things she fears most will be found out concerning herself, and her damnable husband!

Bill Clinton's monetary history should be open to review, also. There's gold in them hills, I'd reckon...we've already seen large samples of it.

When some of it does eventually come out (they won't be able to hide all of it, and some stuff they will let out deliberately, so they can *control* it) then look for complications and obsfucations, amid the out-right denials, and the incessant spin, spIN, SPIN!
People won't be able to keep up with all the garbage. It will be made deliberately difficult to sort out. So instead, folks will quit trying to find out the truth, and simply transpose their own "hopes for goodness" onto their candidate. It's worked for them in the past, but now, even the dhimmowhit electorate is getting sick enough of it, that they are clinging to Obama, like a liferaft.

He has nothing, really, other than he is not Billary, and he can talk real nice. *HOPE* *Change!*

All he has to do is keep pointing to the general voter disatifaction (that the DNC/Soros cabal have been drumming into their ears concerning George Bush & Republicans) while holding out some vague promise of alleviating these fears, and presto --- he's got 'em eating out of his hand!
Very much like Bill did in '92. Which is much to the why, behind Bill saying, "give me a break! this is a fairy tale". Bill knows damn well his own rise was a "fairy tale"...built on lies, up one side, and down the other. It's just that he was so good at it, being the bright fellow that he is, he was able to get people to believe those lies. He even began to believe everything that came out of his own mouth. His witch of a wife, is exactly the same...totally lacking critical self-examination, or healthy self doubt. This pair, are a couple of genuine sociopaths.

Sorry about the rant...I'm probably not telling you anything new...but once one get's started, then it seems like the outline, just begs to be fleshed out somewhat. Hope you don't mind too much.

I'm starting to wonder if Hillary would be easier than Obama, for a Republican candidate to beat in the general election. I'm becoming more certain of it, with each passing day. Go Hillary?

24 posted on 02/12/2008 4:48:41 PM PST by BlueDragon (what a sad song it has become, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson