Posted on 02/11/2008 12:13:41 PM PST by forkinsocket
“I dont care about Irving Kristol. I dont care about William Kristol. Neither one of them had anything to do with our invasion of Iraq and neither of them caused us to win the House & Senate in 2004. So I just consider anybody who seriously discusses it to either be uninformed or somebody with an agenda involving blaming Jews for everything.”
I think you forgot your sarcasm tag.
Neo-con and neo-liberal extend back to the 1970s at least. The neo-cons supported both military and public spending (think Scoop Jackson) as well as a militant foreign policy (esp. as it pertained to supporting Israel). The neo-liberals supported a sort-of third way; big public sector but trying to harness markets (think Paul Tsongas or Bill Bradley) I think that Tsongas wrote a book of the name neo-liberal in the late 1970s, and the New Republic was a neo-liberal magazine.
Has anyone read David Horowitz’s current blog on this Heilbrunn character? Seems that he has a proclivity for lying and distortion. Why is everyone taking him so seriously?
Has anyone read David Horowitz’s current blog on this Heilbrunn character? Seems that he has a proclivity for lying and distortion. Why is everyone taking him so seriously?
Neocons are the thinkers of the XXI century who understood the threat of radical islam and rogue states years before others.
God bless them
only very partially sarcastic. very partially.
For all I know, people think I’m a neocon. And that I don’t think they are saying it with any love in their hearts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.