[timm22]

Years of smokers shoving it non-smoker’s faces are coming to an end. A lot of us non-smokers feel no sympathy for those that laughed at us when we asked them to put out their cigs because it was tough for us to breathe.

Do you think revenge for uncivil behavior is a valid reason to restrict property rights?

[thefactor]

tell me how this restricts property rights. i’m just asking.

[sakic]

Years of smokers shoving it non-smoker’s faces are coming to an end. A lot of us non-smokers feel no sympathy for those that laughed at us when we asked them to put out their cigs because it was tough for us to breathe.——————————————————

“Do you think revenge for uncivil behavior is a valid reason to restrict property rights?”———————————————————————

It’s not a case of revenge. It’s a case of the majority finally getting what they want instead of having smoke jammed down their throats by the minority.

Property rights is always an interesting discussion when it comes down to specifics.

Should the owner of a restaurant have the right to bar entrance to blacks or Jews?