Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CSM
neither. my point is that since there is a ban, i am able to work in bars.

if there was no ban, i would simply find somewhere else to make extra $.

when i used to go to bars and come home reeking of smoke due to other people i didn't like it but i knew it was my own personal choice to go to bars. i could just as easily stay away if i had wanted to.

but the fact is that the ban is in place and it makes my life easier. the smokers go outside and then come back inside and have stopped complaining. if people around here want to give me the old, "this is the first step to gov't control, blah blah, you're all just sheep, blah..." then fine. go ahead. but i am making easy money and i'm happier. oh, and i quit smoking.

you guys should be more worried about the price of smokes. outrageous!

144 posted on 02/11/2008 9:25:00 AM PST by thefactor (that innocence shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: thefactor

“but the fact is that the ban is in place and it makes my life easier.”

It is sheep like you that have handed the tools to the government to regulate the menu of certain restaurants and their ability to serve some undesirables. Your attitude of complacence is more dangerous than Hillary’s socialist activism, because it is also more common.

Won’t it make everyone’s lives easier when we get “free” healthcare? Never mind that the scope of government infringement personal liberties is greatly expanded.


148 posted on 02/11/2008 9:44:27 AM PST by CSM ("Dogs and beer. Proof that God loves us.- Al Gator (8/24/2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson