Nancy Pleads Obama's Case to Assad
I misread the headline.
Interesting read ... thanks for posting this.
“Washington must rectify the wrong policy of President George Bush in Lebanon and resort to an efficient and permanent diplomacy, rather than empty slogans,” he said.
“What is bizarre about this sentence,”
It may be bizarre, but fits with American liberalism. An arrogant creed it believes only it “understands” the world, and the mere fact of it talking to foreigners will reach goals. Not American goals, but the goals of a soothed liberal confrimed with satisfied liberal prejudices.
One might just as easily conclude that the author's problem is he’s the latest in a seemingly limitless supply of naïve journalists who are fooled by Obama's slick words and rock-star appearance into believing that he's simply an innocent liberal who just wants to do good...
“Assad...it’s the reason he continues to pretend what he wants is just “dialogue.” As if he just wants a friend and Bush is mean for not listening, as if “dialogue” is a cry for help so someone can help him kick his terrorist habit.”
That was very good.
Barack Obama’s Middle East Expert
American Thinker | January 23, 2008 | Ed Lasky
Posted on 01/23/2008 3:27:15 AM EST by forkinsocket
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1958065/posts
“Barack Obama is not a leftist. He is a liberal.”
Wrong.
Obama’s foreign policy advisor is former Carter man Brzezinski. That is more dangerous.