"My mind is made up. Don't confuse me with the facts." OK Reign of Error, have it your way. If you deny 2LoT promotes maximum randomness as a natural law, then there's nothing I can do to help you with that.
What about species that necessarily has to jump from one to another for evolution to hold? What does that have to do with the 2nd law?
Hmmm. Gosh, let me think. Nothing, I guess if 2LoT has nothing to do with maximum randomness. But of course that's exactly what its about. As I said, if you deny the actual text of the 2LoT then what's the point in continuing this discussion?
(I will attempt to continue.) 2LoT and maximum randomness as well as reality, the friend of true science, says that if you blow up a garage, the result won't be a car waiting for you to drive away. Evolution says, "Well, maybe...", over and over again. It says that from the dawn of "uncreation" until now, all by unintelligent random chance this big beautiful world has come into existence with its innumerable trillions of intricacies of "unintelligent" design.
Creation and intelligent design has mountains of evidence and proof and points to the existence of an intelligent Creator. Your godless and random evolution is a crackpot theory that has no scientific foundation, contradicting both common sense, reality and known scientific law.
If you blow up a person the result won't be particularly organized either. Do you have a point?