[Jim W N]

These are salamanders you're talking about right? You're not talking about fish that somehow morphed into animals or monkeys that somehow morphed into man, right? The ever-searched-for-and-never-found (nor findable) "missing link" (fraudulent "findings" notwithstanding)?

Your examples cite variations of a species of which there is no argument and plenty of evidence. There is no evidence in science of creatures jumping from one species to another which is absolutely required for evolution to be true. It is therefore certainly easy to maintain that there is not one shred of scientific evidence of a fish becoming an animal or of a monkey becoming a man.

Next.

[Coyoteman]

These are salamanders you're talking about right? You're not talking about fish that somehow morphed into animals or monkeys that somehow morphed into man, right? The ever-searched-for-and-never-found (nor findable) "missing link" (fraudulent "findings" notwithstanding)?

Your examples cite variations of a species of which there is no argument and plenty of evidence. There is no evidence in science of creatures jumping from one species to another which is absolutely required for evolution to be true. It is therefore certainly easy to maintain that there is not one shred of scientific evidence of a fish becoming an animal or of a monkey becoming a man.

Your understanding of what the theory of evolution says, as well as how science works, is so lacking that it is not productive to even discuss these matters with you.