[ReignOfError]

A snowflake disproves the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?

No one here is trying to disprove the 2nd Law. Just to explain why it does not refute evolution.

The far more narrow point of the snowflake was that you demanded ONE (emphasis yours) example to support Coyoteman's statement that "order from disorder happens on Earth all the time." I gave you an example that happens billions of times a day.

[ReignOfError]

Correction for the sake of accuracy; Jim didn’t demand “ONE example,” he demanded “ANY examples.” ReignOfError apologizes for the error.

[Jim W N]

You're going to have to do better than this. The 2nd law states there's tendency toward maximum randomness and is certainly one of many scientific laws and facts that refute your evolution.

The existence of snowflakes does not suspend this law. Molecules of water changing into crystal is a change of energy form not a jump from chaos to order.

What about species that necessarily has to jump from one to another for evolution to hold? Again, there is not only a lack of a preponderance of evidence, there is no evidence. Why do you hold on too such gibberish? I dare say,

...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: (II Thessalonians 2:10, 11).

I hope you are not counted among these.