Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
Believe me, if Hunter or Thomspon were running, this would have been a no-brainer. Here's my rationale:

Huckabee is running. Romney is not. Huckabee is far, far preferable to McCain: He is malleable by the likes of Duncan Hunter who can fill in the gaps in defense/national security, and supports protection of the big-picture values and presuppositions about human dignity and justice that enabled us to have a United States of America to begin with.

Perfect? Not even close. But the best we've got.

Whether or not he can mathematically beat John McCain is irrelevant with regard to doing the right thing. Technically he could and it would be easier with Romney out of the race. Regardless of the ultimate end result, I've done my duty.

183 posted on 02/09/2008 6:31:48 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: Lexinom

One of the most important things to me is the WOT, and I’m not sold on Huck for that yet. I’m also not sold on him re spending (not) on entitlements, including new ones. He also wanted to grant in-state tuition to illegals, which doesn’t make me very happy. I’ll have to look at his platform a little more. It will be interesting to see a debate between he and McCain and if they still play nicey-nice now that they don’t have Mitt to bash.


287 posted on 02/09/2008 7:44:27 PM PST by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: Lexinom

As far as I know, Romney is still running, just not actively campaigning. Has that changed?


395 posted on 02/09/2008 9:22:55 PM PST by Eva (Benedict Arnold was a war hero, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson