Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01; Rennes Templar; Keith in Iowa; mathurine; Atchafalaya; Ignatz; nygoose; muawiyah; ...
But I'm not inclined to blame some mysterious "them

Who schedules the primaries so this one is early, that one is latter? Who punishes states by stripping them of their delegates for trying to move their caucus/primary up to an earlier date? Who decides if it is a primary or a caucus? Who decided if a primary, in an early state, is open and that one is closed? Who decides to hype the media coverage of say a certain Candide squeaking out a win in state A and ignoring him getting blown by double digits in State B? How is it that the media spends 90% more time talking about Candidate A, who finished 4th in Iowa then they do talking about Candidate B who pulled a surprising 3 place finish? Why do party politicians line up, like good little whores, to all endorse a specific candidate? Who decides the timing of those endorsements to make sure they have maximum impact on the voter's?

The process is manipulated. It just done in such a way most of you never notice.

This habit of adopting contempt without knowing is a serious weakness in Americans. We are all so sure that everyone is exactly as our teachers and or our TVs tell us.

No, powerful people are powerful mainly because they know how to make their own luck. Powerful people try to keep that power. It not some evil plot where the faceless evil ones sit around and pick who will win this or that election. But by controlling the scheduling and structure of things the connected make an outcome more likely.

That one of the reasons nothing ever changes. People automatically dismiss this sort of information as "kooky". The author does have some valid points. There is some nuttiness to this article sure, but there is some validity to the points being made.

The Primaries are rigged. That doesn't mean they are not honest competitions but that they are structured and gamed as much as possible so that the Party Chiefs, not us peons, pick the candidate.

You all would be wise to not sneer so quickly at what you are being told. The author gets it more right then wrong.

49 posted on 02/09/2008 6:18:44 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Reagan's 11th Commandment is now in effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

Well said.


51 posted on 02/09/2008 7:14:56 AM PST by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Good analysis. The election process has become a beast, just like the IRS. They both need to be dismantled, overhauled and simplified.

It’s possible that the Dem winner may not win because SUPER DELAGATES may overide him. What the hell are super delegates??? Who created that? What happened to VOTES? And the pundits talk of these machinations as if they were written in the Bible.


52 posted on 02/09/2008 8:07:28 AM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
they are structured and gamed as much as possible so that the Party Chiefs, not us peons, pick the candidate.

This election cycle turned on the spotlight for me. I had inklings in previous local elections because things didn't appear 'right' - something was amiss.

Although not the best, this was my analogy. Government jobs - they post/advertise jobs while they have their candidate (within) but need to go through the process anyway.

Your post was informative. It reminds me of my lurking and learning years here when learning was more important than posting. There were some bright minds/great teachers back then. Now it appears there is more fighting which I am guilty of myself.

Thanks.
56 posted on 02/09/2008 11:11:18 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson