Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wil H

It didn’t violate English law because under English law, it is up to the victim whether or not to press charges against his or her assailants, he declined this and decided to arbitrate the matter with a Sharia court.
It’s no different to a neighbour who declines to press charges against a kid he caught stealing from his house, in favour of an arrangement wereby he is punished by having to perform chores for the neighbour for a month or something along those lines....


27 posted on 02/08/2008 10:54:07 AM PST by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: thundrey
It didn’t violate English law because under English law, it is up to the victim whether or not to press charges against his or her assailants

That's not entirely true, the police can offer the decision to the victim at their discretion but they can still prosecute, without the co-operation of the victim, if they consider there is a public safety issue, which, in case of their being a knife wielding maniac who is prepared to seriously wound or kill someone, I would say there is a good case.

How, otherwise, would you prosecute a murder? Murder victims NEVER press charges.

32 posted on 02/08/2008 12:07:06 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson