Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oshkalaboomboom
It's the 17.7% that lost him any chance of support from conservatives.

Yeah...we should just stay home. /s

He wasn't my first choice either.

He's pro-life (except re: stem cell research) and pro-military, and, at worst, will not make the Supreme any more liberal than it is now. That's really all we have to go on this time around. In retrospect, GWB doesn't really get many more conservative "gold stars" than McCain. And that, IMO, is the real issue that everyone is "venting" about...we wanted a pub candidate that was more conservative than GWB...we didn't get it. In reality...Thompson and Hunter were the only ones that qualified in that category, and, IMO, a vote for Mitt=another 4 years of GWB style conservatism.

At any rate...is letting Hillobama get the WH really worth it? I think not.

83 posted on 02/08/2008 7:05:25 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (Game over man...GAME OVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: BureaucratusMaximus

If one looks at McCain’s conservative rating for the last 10 years, it is not much different than Hillary’s record. This is the reality. The so-called 83% comes from votes taken when McCain was pretending to be a Reagan conservative.


88 posted on 02/08/2008 7:23:54 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson