Now is the Winter of Our Conservative Discontent

American Thinker ^ | February 07, 2008 | Thomas Lifson

[neverdem]

The prospect of John McCain as Republican nominee is inspiring sometimes angry resistance from millions of conservative stalwarts. Ann Coulter's famous support for Hillary Clinton  threatens to spark a wave of conservative "suicide voters"  if the Arizona Senator gets the nomination.

Other Republicans, variously called insiders, party pros, elitists and worse, blithely assure us the alienated base will come around in the end and vote for McCain and the GOP ticket, particularly if Hillary Clinton is the alternative.

Assuming McCain gets the nomination, I am not so sure. It could go either way.

Anger at McCain

Anger has been a consistent theme for 7 years on the left, beginning with outrage over Bush's electoral victory. Anger now has now become a familiar conservative motif, as well. McCain has provoked a profound animus from conservatives ranging from Rush Limbaugh and Thomas Sowell on down to the posters at numerous conservative blogs, emailers to this site, and callers to talk radio. McCain's Legislative sins prominently include McCain-Feingold, McCain-Lieberman, and McCain-Kennedy. All three feel to principled conservatives like monstrous betrayals -- liberalism that can only make things worse.

Then there is the obvious relish with which McCain sometimes sticks it to the disaffected voters to his right, as with his comment on a conference call to bloggers likening ANWR and the Grand Canyon as places we shouldn't drill for oil. The conservative base of the GOP has been dissed by the Senator on multiple occasions like this, in ways big and small.

To be fair, this in-your-face attitude has caused trouble for him on the left as well, witness his remark that we could have troops in Iraq for one hundred years and that would be "fine", in response to a hostile questioner in New Hampshire. This man enjoys challenging, sometimes baiting, his opponents, and when provoked may still retain a little of the propensity for getting himself in trouble that he displayed at Annapolis and as a fighter jockey.

Discontent

McCain's nose-thumbing stings all the worse for conservatives because it has been unusually tough to be a conservative of late. The loss of Congressional majorities still stings. President Bush has been no Reagan, except in his commitment to victory in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush's fiscal profligacy has been dispiriting, as has his tendency to accommodate Ted Kennedy and other liberals.

Conservatives feel they need a champion. Instead of an inspiring new conservative leader, they have now pinned their hopes on Mitt Romney, who has attracted several major conservative endorsements since McCain became the man to beat. Governor Romney is a fine and able man, but his evolving positions and managerial speaking style do not recommend him for the role of ideological champion.

All in all, it is more than reasonable for conservatives to feel somewhat abandoned. They are unappreciated by McCain, and, so it almost seems, by the party that may be about to nominate him.

Atmospherics

Relentless media portrayals of the supposed misery inflicted on America by Bush and other conservatives also have taken their toll. Conservatives ably critique mainstream media coverage of the economy, Iraq, immigration, and other issues, but these words rarely reach beyond the world of the internet and talk radio. The vaster reach of the liberal media has created an atmosphere in which conservatives have to fight against a media-spawned general public impression that having the GOP run the White House or Congress was a very bad idea.

In the major media, the American economy is never celebrated as a success (though Bush's track record has been good), but always seen as a problem. The now-classic portrayal of coffin makers in Iraq suffering as the carnage has declined crystallizes beyond satire the media's gloom-mongering. Iraq was a horrendous disaster, and then it just vanished from consideration as the Surge turned things around. The media have been telling Americans that things are in terrible shape for seven years, thanks to Bush and the conservatives, and too many people buy it because TV comedians joke about it. There are a lot of parties at which it is not much fun to be an open conservative, and not just in Berkeley.

Schadenfreude Season

The sole pleasure being a conservative now is enjoyment of Hillary Clinton's life-and-death struggle for the Democratic nomination. She expected a coronation and ran into Barack Obama's charisma, likeability and extraordinary appeal to those delighted at the prospect of finally having a black American occupy the nation's highest office. His race card has trumped her gender card.

She and Bill have already drawn down the family wealth and loaned the campaign five million dollars, while Obama is reported to have raised three million dollars yesterday alone, raising the question of how far will the Clintons go in financing her campaign, against Obama, the candidate with all the momentum Hillary was known as a tightwad, so this kind of financial drain must be painful indeed for her, and persuading Bill to cough up the dough from his gigs in Dubai, Kazakhstan and other erstwhile friendly states may be no picnic.

If the Democrats' contest lasts all the way to the convention floor, it will get down and dirty, possibly with Hillary needing to pressure super delegates and make a stink about seating the Florida and Michigan delegations, if she is to win. Americans, including conservatives, will be treated to the spectacle of Hillary Hardball being played on Obama, and Obama fighting back. This will serve as a handy reminder to the conservative base of how bad either Democrat alternative to McCain would be. 

How Many Conservatives Can McCain Lure Back?

Inevitably at least some conservatives will cool their passions between now and November and rally to defeat Clinton or Obama, unless Senator McCain further aggravates and alienates them during the campaign (a possibility that cannot be ruled out). But McCain potentially could expand the number by addressing both the substantive and emotional problems conservatives have had with his behavior. He must win both hearts and minds, to adopt a Vietnam era slogan. Today's scheduled speech by McCain at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) offers an opportunity to begin mending fences. 

On a substantive level, he has to emphasize the part of his record that is consistent with at bedrock conservative values, showing how very different he would be from the Democrats' nominee. His strongest case is in national defense, but he could leverage his record on fiscal restraint into a push for lower taxes while shrinking the deficit. McCain has a career rating of over 80% from the ACU, while his democratic opponents have approximately 10% ratings

Perhaps his biggest opportunity to neutralize previous damage is with immigration reform. He needs to make it clear that he no longer favors rewarding illegal residents with permanent residence or a shot at American citizenship, unless they pay some penalty and get back in line in some symbolically and substantively important way. If he is able backtrack and admit doing so, a door opens for him. 

McCain is almost uniquely endowed with the ability to speak meaningfully about the obligations of citizenship, having so spectacularly sacrificed personally in serving his nation. A ringing defense of the heroic service of immigrant soldiers who have earned American citizenship, along with a plan to reform naturalization processes to make it possible for legal immigration to better meet America's needs and interests, could turn the issue around.

In the realm of feelings, some form of direct or indirect apology can be a useful tool of reconciliation in normal group dynamics. But Senator McCain may not have it in him to apologize per se. But if in some form he acknowledges, directly or indirectly, that he regrets the stress he has created for conservatives, that would help his case on a purely emotional level. He might be able to get some mileage out of agreeing to hear out critics of global warming theory, or acknowledging problems with campaign finance reform, or consider reversing himself on ANWR drilling, painting a picture of a man who can learn from his mistakes.

At the same time, he has to avoid giving centrist voters the impression that he is knuckling under to the hard right. A tricky feat for even a sensitive feeling sort of guy, much less for a man who prides himself on speaking his mind and has a temper. A   bungled attempt could aggravate matters.

Mitt Romney at this moment is unlikley to be able to pick up momentum and secure the nomination, of course. Only time will tell.

But John McCain seems poorly equipped by temperament to winning over the hearts of alienated conservatives. Which creates the need, if not yet a supply, of conservative leaders willing to help nudge him along toward reconciliation by going a few baby steps forward themselves, in the interest of keeping the United States on the course to victory in Iraq and in the War on Terror.

Thomas Lifson is the editor and publisher of American Thinker.

[se_ohio_young_conservative]

yeah. ok. whatever LOL...

[LadyNavyVet]

Great comeback.

[JasonC]

I'm 41. My vote isn't going to be annihilated - when a child is born, I rejoice, I don't mourn that my vote is being annihilated. My finances are not going to be annihilated - they rest on my own usefulness to other people and my own prudence savings and investing.

And yes I find all the yellow peril retread nonsense a joke. The political effects of one US voter in ten changing their mind about which party they can trust on national security, is the difference between Jimmy Carter and a Reagan II landslide. The American people are free and sovereign and in charge of their own destiny, politically and otherwise.

[exhaustedmomma]

psssst, terrorist came into this country on 911 [they all aren't in Iraq]. Can you, or any of us, say with any degree of certainty more have NOT come in? Who exactly is crossing our borders, and how many "really" are there crossing? McCain is the rep of a border state. Why should I trust him with Iraq when he hasn't dealt with his own state's issues?

Besides, what kind of leader has to bus in people to support him at a Conservative convention? (Republican use to be synomonous with conservative.) If he can't take the boo's, he needs to step out of the limelight.

[Man50D]

have now pinned their hopes on Mitt Romney,

That doesn't include me. Romney isn't a Conservative.

[Man50D]

Time to just swallow our anger and Move ON.. I reckun

That tired old defeatist thinking has been a loser every time. Most recently in 2006. The GOP establishment is learning the conservative grassroots people are no longer falling for the old hold your nose and vote for the lesser of two evils garbage. It is coming back to haunt the GOP.

[Man50D]

John McCain has a rating of 82%

That vague statement lacks any credibility without more detail. This arbitrary statistic comes from the American Conservative Union. Anyone or group can quote figures based on very subjective criteria and present them as fact. Since you consider the ACU rating as gospel with respect to McCain then here are a few more facts from the American Thinker.

First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, the latest year for which the ACU has its ratings posted online. For that most recent year in particular, McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), for example, scored 64 and 75, respectively, in 2006.

Generally, McCain has voted less conservatively in more recent years. His average for 1990-97 was 88, but was only 74 for 1998-2006.

Also consider he is supported by Joe Lieberman who has only a 16.8% ACU rating. A rating that low tells you LIEberman is far more a Socialist than Conservative. If the ACU factored that stat into their arbitrary rating then suddenly McCain's ACU life time rating is much lower than your's and Reagan's 82%. John McCain is right on the terror war.

John McCain's war on terror couldn't be weaker and more dangerous. The war on terror extends beyond Afghanistan and Iraq. It includes our borders with Mexico and Canada. It is a fact terrorists have entered and are entering this country to destroy us from within. Jon McCain still wants to grant amnesty to illegal aliens. His position imperils American lives.

[se_ohio_young_conservative]

what else do we do then, man ? any bright ideas.

[Octar]

McCain will make a fine President. I cant stand to see people unfairly drill him over and over because he does not walk the party. Is that how it is ? My way or the highway ? that is shamefull

I agree with you. I'm getting very tired of those who continue to call John McCain a traitor and worse and proudly crow that they would never vote for him. These are the same dopes who gave the congress to the democrats in 2006. Principles, don'cha know and all that. They are like a child who, upon not getting what he wanted, sits in the corner with his lower lip out, playing with his poop, expecting sympathy.

[Octar]

what is the most important issue of our time ? The issue that McCain talks about and Democrats avoid ?

The fight against inlamic terrorism. Both from without and, very soon, from within. If we lose that, none of the other issues matters.

[se_ohio_young_conservative]

I think about the speech Ronald Reagan gave at the 1964 convention. I wish someone would give a speech like that now ?

Every other issue doesnt matter much unless we realize that we are in a war that needs to be won.

[SunkenCiv]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1955546/posts?page=103#103
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1966839/posts?page=286#286
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1966839/posts?page=658#658
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1967755/posts?page=3#3

[Fred Nerks]

Sadly, no one is listening...

I hate to say it, and it will fall on deaf ears anyway...but in Australia we vote for the Party. We may not particularly like the Leader who stands for the Party as candidate for Prime Minister, but we vote for him anyway.

The Prime Minister is that and nothing more. He never becomes a subject of worship nor a celebrity...and when, whoever he is, has been around a little too long, the small percentage of voters in the middle-ground turn around and change their vote to the Opposition.

We rarely argue about it. Life goes on.

[hosepipe]

Most republicans are seething..

Others are wondering if they are republicans(anymore) at all.. The Party has "moved on" to uncharted ground.. It could be most/many republicans are "something else" rather than republicans.. It appears the "party" has been penetrated by socialists and other liberals.. No doubt many are re-thinking their options.. at a base level.. I know I am..

[Man50D]

what else do we do then, man ? any bright ideas.

I know this may sound like a novel idea to many but how about voting for a Conservative?

[Man50D]

what else do we do then, man ? any bright ideas.

Jim Robinson has a good idea. Primary Voters: Vote against McCain! Vote for deadlock! Vote anyone but McCain! It maybe working considering yesterday's results.

[se_ohio_young_conservative]

Jim is great. I love his passion.

[SunkenCiv]

“the small percentage of voters in the middle-ground turn around and change their vote to the Opposition.”

In the US, most people are in the middle-ground; there appear to be some who can never accept that. Thanks FredN.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965682/posts?page=12#12