Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gleeaikin

I thought sugar needed nitrate added in order to be explosive.

Obviously I don’t know...


41 posted on 02/08/2008 12:09:31 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: DB

Sugar dust is very flammable from what we’re hearing.

Think about it, how quickly does sugar smoke on the stove? Or how easy is it to burn something like cinnamon toast??


46 posted on 02/08/2008 5:49:40 AM PST by najida (I am so grateful that stupid isn't contagious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: DB
Not at all. Any type of powder or dust can be explosive if there’s enough of it. Grain elevator explosions were common years ago. Due to the high pressure at the bottom of the mass from a build up of unreleased kinetic energy, one static spark would set off most types of stored powder, dust, or grains. Better grounding, ventilation, and storage has reduced these incidents.

What happened at the sugar plant is anybody’s guess at this time. Most manufacturing plants where airborne powder is a factor have large dust extraction systems to prevent explosions like this one.

53 posted on 02/08/2008 10:36:45 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson