Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Owl558

I can appreciate your principled approach—supporting the troops, saving the babies, and no or less taxes.

As far as less or no taxes, McCain Lieberman will collapse this economy, meaning lots of taxes for bailouts of consumers and business and state governments. McCain Kennedy will make permanent the tax level required to take care of 20 million new citizens, and let’s not forget the additonal 30 million family members that they will be allowed to sponsor.

As far as saving the babies, John McCain has spoken out of both sides of his mouth. He may have voted well, but he has not been an outspoken fighter for babies and against abortion. Indeed each is quoted as being on both sides of the issue. Besides there is no guarantee that he will appoint constructiuonist judges. The Gang of 14 which he founded took many of those away and allowed the status quo in the Senate. It has not been shown that McLame will allow judges that Ted Kennedy does not approve of. So the chances are we will get more David Souters rather than Sam Alitos. So good luck with that.

The last point is support for the troops. Yes, McCain might be good on that. Will he be as stron as Bush has been in the face of withering pressure to do otherwise? It is much easier as a Senator to preach and bully than as the Commander in Chief who alone is responsible for them and the mission. Also, when McLame says he is tough on national security, how does that square with his sudden found need to build the wall, and his work to shove amnesty down our throats before we could react to it?

For the points for which McCain is viable in your eyes, you can see that he is not trustworthy, except for Iraq. But Iraq will pass in importance. Having Gitmo terrorists in American courts on American soil, giving non-combatants rights under the Geneva Convention, and not allowing waterboarding even if the fate of millions of Americans hang in the balance shows that McQueeg will not be stroing on national defense or defend our troops.

By applying our threat not to vote in droves for McCrazy, we may yet effect the outcome of this nomination. I’m not going to fold now, and sing Kumbaya, so the Republican leadership can feel we conservatives won’t leave the plantation.

No, I’m proclaiming my emancipation, and they, the GOP puppet masters who would give us McCain to fight Hillary, can take full responsiblity for their actions and for their forseeable defeat.


154 posted on 02/07/2008 6:11:27 PM PST by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: exit82

“By applying our threat not to vote in droves for McCrazy, we may yet effect the outcome of this nomination. I’m not going to fold now, and sing Kumbaya, so the Republican leadership can feel we conservatives won’t leave the plantation.”

That’s the best point I’ve seen made all week. We did get our judges by applying the same pressure.


185 posted on 02/07/2008 9:21:40 PM PST by Owl558 (Pardon my spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson