Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Definition Of Insanity .... (Musharraf wants yet another cease-fire with Taliban)
Captain's Quarters ^ | Feb. 07, 2008 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/07/2008 7:27:06 AM PST by jdm

Pervez Musharraf has apparently learned little from his tussle with the Taliban. Reports have Pakistan entering into negotiations .... again ... with the Taliban .... again ... for another cease-fire. This time, they have even more bargaining chips, having control of the Swat region:

Taliban militants declared a cease-fire Wednesday in fighting with Pakistani forces, and the government said it was preparing for peace talks with al-Qaida-linked extremists in the lawless tribal area near the border with Afghanistan.

Any deal that allows armed Islamic extremists to operate on Pakistani soil would run counter to U.S. demands for the government to crack down on militants. The Bush administration contends a failed truce last year allowed al-Qaida to expand its reach into this turbulent, nuclear-armed country, and the U.S. has sounded warnings in recent days about a revival of militant strength.

A spokesman for Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, a militant umbrella group, said the new cease-fire would include not only the tribal belt along the Afghan border but also the restive Swat region to the east where the army has also battled pro-Taliban fighters.

Two local Pakistani security officials told The Associated Press on Thursday that the truce followed secret talks with the militants and tribal elders. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the issue is sensitive.

Two previous truces collapsed when the Taliban ended their hudna and used their gathered strength to attack Musharraf's forces. The previous truces allowed the Taliban and al-Qaeda to consolidate their positions in the Waziristans and the North West Frontier Province. The Pakistani military had just begun an offensive against them in South Waziristan when the government called a halt to the operation. One Pakistani journalist wondered aloud why Musharraf bothered to start the operation in the first place, just to abandon it before even attempting to reach its objectives.

The worst aspect of this is the choice of partner for negotiation. The leader of Tehrik-e Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud, is the man thought responsible for planning and ordering the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Bhutto's party reacted predictably, noting that Musharraf's own government holds Mehsud responsible for the assassination and condemning the talks.

If Musharraf concludes a peace treaty with a man who assassinates Pakistani political figures, it will send a message to the entire political class -- every man and woman for himself. It will also make clear that the way to get to the table with Musharraf is to pick off one or more of his political opponents. Don't think that message won't come across plainly in Pakistan.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: musharraf; pakistan

1 posted on 02/07/2008 7:27:09 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm

HOORAY Ed Morrissey! WOOOOHOOOO!


2 posted on 02/07/2008 7:29:34 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I have a question... won’t peace talks draw these Tali-ban from their caves?
3 posted on 02/07/2008 7:29:41 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Musharrraf wants to preserve himself, of course. He will work with us when doing so serves that goal. And do otherwise when his position requires it.

Should be no surprise to anyone.


4 posted on 02/07/2008 7:50:54 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti; GOPJ; Tigen; AliVeritas; Grimmy; gonzo; DeaconBenjamin; indcons; sukhoi-30mki; ...
Pakistan ۋﮧ۱م

FReepmail if you want on or off
5 posted on 02/07/2008 8:08:16 AM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

So, let’s send a few more billions U.S. dollars to this assclown mooselimb.


6 posted on 02/07/2008 8:16:44 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

No. Since 2005, the Paskistanis cut 3 peace deals and each one had made the terrorists many fold stronger. Besides, the Pakistanis know where the leaders are in any case. They just choose to act only when our leaders press them hard and then they back off.


7 posted on 02/07/2008 9:38:38 AM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I don’t know the explanation for this action, but I think the hypothesis that Musharraf is insanely irrational has a very low prior probability.


8 posted on 02/07/2008 9:50:39 AM PST by Wallaby (http://headland.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Hey Mush! Let Swat become independent, and then allow the forces of civilization to flush out the scum from the place.


9 posted on 02/08/2008 11:09:53 AM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson