Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana
Just as an off topic, I don't believe angels are female or baby cherubs. I don't know why pictures show angels as soft feminine characters. I can't find them in the Bible.

It's not that big of a deal, but I just don't understand why we insist on changing what is in the Bible. When you see people mourning a loved one, they talk of them becoming angels. Angels are created beings that don't have salvation through the blood of Jesus. There is an advantage to being a saved saint rather than being an angel that longs to understand why Jesus died for us and condemned 1/3 of the angels. When a person dies, they don't become an angel. Angels are able to travel between earth and heaven, saints in heaven cannot. Angels guard us, fight our battles, and fight evil beings in wars we don't even know about. Saints are resting in God's presence.

Mini rant over....now we can get back to praising God for His wonderful mercy and protection.

10 posted on 02/07/2008 7:49:37 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: chuckles

I have spoken nearly identical words! I like the way Frank Peretti depicts angels in his first two books!


14 posted on 02/07/2008 8:20:08 AM PST by kimmie7 (this year i will turn ffff....ffo........foooort.........i can't say it. i'll just be 20. twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: chuckles
You are correct, chuckles. Angels are male, nothing in the Bible supports the belief that angels are female.
Our former pastor emphasized this, especially at Christmas.
17 posted on 02/07/2008 8:30:34 AM PST by Wiser now (Happiness is not an absence of problems, but the ability to deal with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: chuckles
Just as an off topic, I don't believe angels are female or baby cherubs. I don't know why pictures show angels as soft feminine characters. I can't find them in the Bible.

Short version: Those aren't angels. They are putti. It's mostly centuries of sloppiness that's gotten them labeled angels.

28 posted on 02/07/2008 12:36:42 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: chuckles

Do you really need to nitpick? Maybe that’s what some people believe, can’t you respect that right? Unfortunately, not everyone reads the bible. And among many that do, not all of them read it the way you do!


31 posted on 02/07/2008 3:37:36 PM PST by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: chuckles
I don't believe angels are female or baby cherubs.

You're correct, in the Bible they're male and and they have strength. Perhaps some people are not aware of this.

34 posted on 02/07/2008 10:24:00 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: chuckles
Just as an off topic, I don't believe angels are female or baby cherubs. I don't know why pictures show angels as soft feminine characters.

And I don't believe they are only caucasian or blonde either, but thats my mini rant.

43 posted on 02/13/2008 11:43:26 AM PST by neither-nor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson