1 posted on
02/06/2008 1:23:13 PM PST by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 last
To: blam
Assume all this is possible - would it also be possible for a group to decide that time travel is too socially destabilizing and travel back in time to destroy the machine?
195 posted on
02/18/2008 10:39:12 AM PST by
PghBaldy
(I have had a feeling of deja vu for decades (I also have had hundreds of seizures))
To: blam
"I wonder if they brought any game film with them?"
197 posted on
02/18/2008 10:46:32 AM PST by
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
To: blam
But the Russians argue that when the energies of the LHC are concentrated into a subatomic particle - a trillionth the size of a mosquito - they can do strange things to the fabric of the universe, which is a blend of space and time that scientists called spacetime. But whatif that subatomic particle is contained inside a slice of bologna?
Would it ba called bolognaspace?
200 posted on
02/18/2008 10:54:50 AM PST by
uglybiker
(I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
To: blam
I’ll give them the answer now. There is no “time travel” and there will never be, and there never was. It is impossible. never happen. Waste of money and energy.
It’s about causality. We live in a world where one event causes another. The caused event comes after the causing event. Can’t be any other way.
To: blam
To: blam
204 posted on
02/18/2008 11:00:32 AM PST by
rintense
(You don't advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. Piss off McCain and Huck!)
To: blam
1.21 gigawatts of electricity: Michael J Fox and Christopher Lloyd in the De Lorean time machine from Back to the Future How believable could this be - everyone knows you need 1.21 jigawatts...
206 posted on
02/18/2008 11:09:13 AM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(HRC: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
To: Las Vegas Dave; Quix; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; ...
from a few weeks back.
207 posted on
02/28/2008 10:47:42 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________________Profile updated Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
To: blam; Ezekiel
Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'Old news.
To: blam
If their premise is true about how time travel is only possible back to the point of creation of the first time machine, why would anybody want to open that can of worms? All you’ll have is people from the future coming back to exploit their unique knowledge of events to come.
To: blam
One would seem to have to expand the entire universe to travel to the future, or to go back in time, to contract it.
Barring some quantum aspect - where even that would seem inconceivable, as the universe is a quantum system after all - convince me that this is possible.
212 posted on
02/29/2008 12:09:08 AM PST by
onedoug
To: blam
The debut in early summer could provide a landmark because travelling into the past is only possible - if it is possible at all - as far back as the point of creation of the first time machine.Well, so says The Telegraph, but I would still like confirmation from an unassailable authority like AP or Reuters. Or Dan Rather.
216 posted on
02/29/2008 1:07:16 AM PST by
sphinx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
