Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fold The Tent Conservatives
The Bulletin ^ | 02/06/2008 | Michael P. Tremoglie

Posted on 02/06/2008 9:59:54 AM PST by William Tell 2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
To: NFHale
I agree with you. I have strong disagreements in policy with all the candidates, but the Clintons are a frigging organized crime family.
161 posted on 02/06/2008 5:12:58 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2
If Limbaugh, Dobson and the rest are not going to vote Republican because they might not like Republican nominee does this mean they are going to move out of the country if and when Hillary/Obama are elected - like Alec Baldwin promised to do when Bush was elected?

I think the more pertinent question should be why are Alec Baldwin, Sean Penn, and Barbra Streisand still HERE, since they actually DID threaten to leave if Bush were elected back in 2000.

162 posted on 02/06/2008 6:07:13 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2
If Hillary or Mr. Obama become president after a close election the nation will have the "Fold-the-Tent" conservatives to thank.

And of course the party elites who once again managed to arrange the process so as to raise the bar for conservative candidates. The party controls the primaries, deciding which states go early, allowing the "centrist" (read more leftist) candidates to build momentum early on. Then the MSM kicks in with both support for those "centrists", in part by not covering the more conservative ones at the same level, and in part by the "horse race" type coverage, which is aided by the "Big Mo" talk.

They screwed up once and Ronald Reagan got in, but they've worked hard to be sure THAT doesn't happen again. They failed to defend the likes of Newt Gingrich, or even the ex Dem social conservatives (there really were some) who let their mouths run ahead of their brains a little.

IOW they've been spineless in the face of the enemy, but very aggressive against the right wing of their own party. They couldn't even make an effort to pass a repeal of the unconstitutional Ugly Gun Ban, after Mr. Newt got the House to the pass the repeal, just as he'd promised he would if conservatives swept the DemonRats from power, which they did in 1994.

They can just keep up this sort of thing, but they should not expect conservatives to take that kind of treatment forever.

163 posted on 02/06/2008 8:22:00 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
they’d be sitting out the next 20 years of Supreme Court decisions.

I have zero confidence that the same thing won't happen if McCain is elected. He was a major force behind the obstructionists of judicial nominations, and of the Constitutional option to prevent filibusters of the same. known as the Gang of Fourteen. One the the major reasons, along with McCain-Fiengold, McCain Kennedy, and McCain-Lieberman. (M-F == free speech restrictions, M-K == amnesty, M-L == carbon taxes) for finding him completely unacceptable.

164 posted on 02/06/2008 8:40:51 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2

No, we’re sticking around to pick up the pieces, after McCain and the Huckster finish tearing it apart. We’re going to vote in the election, too, just not for a presidential candidate.

Then we’re going to appoint Mitt Romney to head the GOP, to whip McCain back in line.


165 posted on 02/06/2008 8:49:31 PM PST by Eva (Benedict Arnold was a war hero, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
All the powers of the Patriot Act will be used on average Americans. The so-called Fairness Doctrine will be used to stifle free speech. The Supreme Court will become a monster. Sky-high taxes, massive welfare state, forced socialistic medical care, the breakdown of any sort of constraint on the part of a Clinton/Clinton White House, the possibilities are mind-boggling.

And which of those polices is not also a McCain policy? CFR is just as much a violation of the first amendment as the Fairness Doctrine. You forgot "tanking the economy to prevent Global warming", which both 'Rat candidates and McCain are on board for.

166 posted on 02/06/2008 8:50:40 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

“When there ceases to be a difference between the parties or a benefit to voting Republican, then it is time for a third party. I’m not there yet, but your logic is doing nothing to keep me in line.”

Oh, I see. So the conservatives, who couldn’t even win the Republican primary, are going to start their own party and beat both the Democrats *and* Republicans? Think about what you’re suggesting, man. It’s goofy.

And by the way, I am also disappointed that McCain seems on his way to winning the nomination. But as bad as he is, he is no Hillary. People who think he is as bad as Hillary need to educate themselves on Hillary (or Obama for that matter). Ann Coulter let her emotions get the better of her on this one.

Yes, Hillary voted for the war, but she did so only for political expedience. At the time, the national opinion was heavily in favor of the war. It was nothing more than a “finger to the wind” vote on her part.


167 posted on 02/06/2008 10:34:00 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: BaylorDad

Bush had the chance to vanquish McShame by not signing CFR and having this fight years ago. Based on history, Bush was a fool. F McLame and his crooked propoganda tortise.


168 posted on 02/06/2008 10:44:55 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Bob Dole could beat Juan "Traitor Rat" McAmnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Digital Sniper

Ditto.


169 posted on 02/06/2008 10:54:52 PM PST by Gator113 (McCain has voted against his country's interests, it's time to vote against his.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sun

I agree....


170 posted on 02/06/2008 10:55:46 PM PST by Gator113 (McCain has voted against his country's interests, it's time to vote against his.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2

I’ll make the best with what we got, fight on, work for change, learn from our mistakes, YES we got complacent, and never give up.

Any questions?


171 posted on 02/06/2008 11:29:25 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LADY J
if a Rat gets the White House, we will be right at their doorstep, jumping on every word, every inflection....every bill..every visit...every judicial appt..

its the Rats that had better be prepared for a very thorough rectal exam.....

there will be no honeymoon....even for McCain....

172 posted on 02/06/2008 11:45:31 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RussP
Oh, I see. So the conservatives, who couldn’t even win the Republican primary, are going to start their own party and beat both the Democrats *and* Republicans? Think about what you’re suggesting, man. It’s goofy.

No. Its reasoned. I'm quite capable of holding my nose and voting for the most conservative, but when there is no perceivable difference, or the Republican will do more harm than good for the conservative movement, then its time to start building the party. McCain and Hillary will both deliver socialist liberal policy. Conservatives will be in no place to offer an alternative in 2012 if they have tied their kite to McCain.

If a candidate wants the conservative vote, they need to appeal to conservatives. There is no value in getting a socialist Republican elected, and the "anything but" platform has always been a loser.

I asked you to explain how McCain is better than Hillary on a multitude of important issues from illegal immigration to global warming. The only one you felt you could answer to was the prosecution of the war. And on that I don't think that you understand the practicality of the situation. The next POTUS will execute a drawdown in Iraq no matter who they are and on about the same timeframe (as already planned). If its a Republican, the MSM will say its too slow. If its a Democrat, the MSM will praise it as just right.

Interesting that you blame conservatives for not backing "the Republican Candidate", when McCain has made a career out of sticking knives into the Republican Party. But now, if we don't back him, we're being disloyal. That's a load. If the Republican candidate loses in November, it will be because there was no conservative choice, not because conservatives refused to vote socialist. And the lesson in that will at least be constructive to building a stronger party.

173 posted on 02/07/2008 5:07:46 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free an industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2

I’m not going anywhere. I registered with the American Independent party. The Democrats and Rupublicans can run for office in Mexico...


174 posted on 02/07/2008 5:23:28 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2
Nah... I'm waiting for McCain to mumble “Strike the tent... ”
175 posted on 02/07/2008 5:29:50 AM PST by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell 2

To hell with the presidential race. Let’s concentrate on the races that really matter...Senate and House.


176 posted on 02/07/2008 5:55:39 AM PST by Potts Mtn. Pappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Well, you know it ain’t #4. Of the rest, only #8 fits the context.


177 posted on 02/07/2008 6:05:51 AM PST by thulldud (Insanity: Electing John McCain and expecting a different result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: dangus
OK, OK...Well, then I guess you win, I lose. I shall go now, vanquished by a McCainiac. You are good. I am evil.

I still refuse to vote for him. Even if it means a Democrat gets in.

178 posted on 02/07/2008 8:49:44 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Don't trust anyone who can’t take a joke. [Congressman BillyBob])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson