Massive Republican Voter Suppression in Southern Calilfornia!

News Talk Radio | 02-06-08 | PsyOp

[PsyOp]

Reports are rolling into talk radio stations in San Diego about massive Republican vote suppression.

Thousands of Republican voters in San Diego and as far north as Los Angeles showed up to vote on Tuesday only to be told that they were registered "Non-Partisan". This meant that they could not vote for the Republican Primary candidates.

Non-Partisan (independent) voters in California can vote for Candidates in any other party, including the Democrat party, but are prohibited from voting in the Republican Primary unless they are registered as a Republican.

Rick Roberts [http://www.760kfmb.com] is currently reporting on this and has had hundreds of calls and thousands of e-mails from people who showed up to vote only to be told they were not registered as Republcans. Reports began rolling into the Roger Hedgecock show yesterday.

Several people have called in saying they witnessed this happening at polling place they worked at as volunteers. One gentleman stated that he believed at least 20% of the Republicans that showed up to vote were denied a Republican primary form because the roster showed them as "Non-Partisan".

The Republican Party in California has begun investigating this issue, but the mainstream media continues to report that Californias election "went smoothly".

It seems clear that someone or some group managed to tamper with the voter registration rolls. Either by direct access to the Registrars computer system, or by gaining access to voter information and then sending in registration cards in their name.

Southern California was projected to go heavily in favor in Mitt Romny.

[firebrand]

“There is a vast chasm between the two parties.” —John Bolton, January 29, 2008

[purpleraine]

Of course!

[floriduh voter]

You know campaign donations are all listed on the internet. How hard would it be to hire someone to look up Romney’s donors and weed them out and change their party registration? Not hard at all.

[DJ MacWoW]

“There is a vast chasm between the two parties.” —John Bolton, January 29, 2008

Not if it's McCain.

[firebrand]

opensecrets.com? Find out who donated to whom? But that would be discoverable by the nonexistent FEC.

[floriduh voter]

Look up campaign donors on line. That’s how they may have done it if they did it.

[firebrand]

Surely by Jan. 29 Bolton knew McCain was a good probability.

[floriduh voter]

Campaign donor lists on line. That’s how... sitting ducks. That information is all public.

[DJ MacWoW]

McCain is a liberal. Ignore the “R” behind his name.

[floriduh voter]

Is anybody from California going to CPAC? I hope CPAC doesn’t give McCain a warm welcome. I don’t know anybody who can stand McCain as a prez candidate. Who are these phantom voters who like him? Chances are, they won’t be for him in the election, they’re just making sure he gets dishonestly nominated.

[Kellis91789]

You tell me. Were the people that got switched white & middle-aged voters, or were they non-white & young/elderly voters ?

You said you had 5 Hispanic voters, and they were miraculously untouched by the phenomenom ? What about the Asian voters ? Were they miraculously untouched as well ?

[floriduh voter]

If Bush 43 is a closet McCainiac, then there will be no real investigation imo. Globalists stick together.

[Red Steel]

I’m ready for total internet voting.

You would have to solve the problem are you you for all voters. The computer term is called "non-Repudiation".

[firebrand]

Glad I have you to tell me what to do.

[DLfromthedesert]

I was collecting signatures outside a polling place yesterday, and a gentleman who came out of the building claimed he re-registered as a Republican several years ago, but was told he was registered as a Democrat and was refused the GOP ballot. This was in Tucson, AZ

[floriduh voter]

Campaign donors are all listed on the internet? How easy could that make it? Freepers, put your Columbo trenchcoats on!

[HawaiianGecko]

I wouldn't get to excited.  California law permits unaffiliated (Decline to State) voters to participate in a political party's primary election if authorized by that individual party's rules.  This arrangement is referred to a 'modified closed primary' and has been the law of the land since January 2001.

For the upcoming February 5, 2008, Presidential Primary Election, Decline to State voters are welcome to participate in the Democratic Party or the American Independent Party Primary, but not the Republican Party Primary.

TThe state Republican Party's decision to 'close' their primary was made official when they did not file the requisite statement with the Secretary of State's Office by the September 23 deadline to 'open' their presidential primary.

Basically the author put in an inaccurate and inflammatory headline just to jerk some knots in a few tails.

[DJ MacWoW]

Apparently you need that because I don’t see you refuting McCain-Feingold, blanket amnesty for illegals, The Keating 5, The Gang of 14, etc.

[PsyOp]

This is not about registered independents, non-partisans, or decline-to-state voters not being alowed to vote in a closed Republican Primary (which I support).

This is about registered Republican voters having their party affiliation changed on the voter rolls without their knowledge or permission, and thus being kept from legitimately participating in their chosen party’s primary.

The voter rolls were tampered with. Party affiliations were changed.

[PsyOp]

Our voting system needs a top to bottom overhaul.