Posted on 02/06/2008 5:07:59 AM PST by doug from upland
That is wrong, wrong, wrong!!!
Which one?!, I got a whole bunch of Hillary stuff!!
BTTT
Having seen the entire film, my impression was that the Clintons did cause Paul to be investigated in retaliation for a complaint Paul made to FEC regarding the financing of the gala.
And, BTW, Novak coyly states that the US Attorney who indicted Paul was responsible to a Republican Justice Department and a Republican administration. While technically true at the time of the indictment, the US Attorney in question was a holdover Clinton appointee. (Remember that Bush, unlike Clinton, did not fire all the US attorneys in one fell swoop when he assumed the presidency.) In other words, Novak is giving the false impression that the Paul indictment was the handiwork of Republicans, and therefore was not retaliatory.
It is a very long and complicated explanation regarding the timing of the lawsuit. In fact, the suit was prepared and was seen by Mike Wallace. The Clintons knew the content and knew what was coming thanks to Wallace. That is what triggered Peter’s problems. Larry Klayman actually screwed up and did not file it in a timely manner. A better word than retaliation is pre-emptive strike. Yes, Bush made a really big mistake by allowing all of Clinton’s moles to remain in every department. They did him and our country damage at every opportunity. The so-called “Republican” DOJ is the one that let Sandy Berger off the hook.
Good work Doug...Keep going...hopefully once the trial starts it will raise people’s consciousness about what a liar and con artist the woman who would be POTUS really is..
You can’t expect anything from the liberals who cover up for the clinton crime family. Keep fighting them.
So, is that part of the illusion then? That she was on the committee, Shippers was on the committee, but they never actually worked together?
Schippers was not on the Nixon impeachment committee.
Good heavens, I thought he stated that himself!
I have been repeating bad information for some time, then.
Well, if he has stated it, I had better check it out. If I was involved, I have never heard it.
I just did a google search, I must have been remembering something wrong
oops!
cuz I repeated that for some time now, too!
Interesting you brought up the name Bernie Nussbaum.
Nussbaum was the only superior to Vincent Foster in the WH Office of Legal Counsel at the time of the homicide. Zeifman was a pretty good judge of character, it would seem.
Contrary to the implications of this statemement, Schippers was a lifelong Democrat. In other words, Schippers was not there as partisan witch hunter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.