I'll explain it as simply as I can: private ownership is the opposite of socialism. Corsi is speaking up against the private ownership of assets and in favor of government ownership of assets.
That's socialism.
I've listened to him on Conservative talk radio warn people of the attempt by Socialists to unite the U.S. under a one world order through the NAU, SPP etc... and the disastrous effects it would have on the country.
I am aware that Corsi likes to make stuff up about nonexistent conspiracies that gullible people enjoy hearing about, but that does not change the fact that he is campaigning against private ownership of assets.
Just like Hugo Chavez argues that government ownership of assets is necessary because private ownership of property will have disastrous effects on his country.
Corsi is an enemy of private ownership of assets and he is therefore a socialist - no matter what he likes to call himself.