Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Count of Monte Logan
Which McCain are you voting for?

The McCain of 2003 who was for the war.

The McCain of 2004 for the war against how it was run.

The McCain of 2005 for the war but wanted 250,000 more American “boots on the ground”

The McCain of 2006. Fathers the Baker Commission. Wants to cut a political deal with Iran and Syria so the USA could slink away from Iraq

The McCain of 2007. Presidential Campaign dead in the water. McCain has surrogates fraudulent start claiming HE was the real father of the Surge strategy.

Will the real John McCain please stand up?

25 posted on 02/04/2008 8:34:45 PM PST by MNJohnnie (McCain is about as tough on Foreign Policy as the next opinion poll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

when you can name one admiral or general that supports Romney, please tell me as I’d really love to know.


53 posted on 02/04/2008 8:42:41 PM PST by ari-freedom (Jim Robinson "Free Republic’s goal is to elect conservatives. Romney is NO conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

or, perhaps, the McCain of the “Keating 5” scandal:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five


65 posted on 02/04/2008 8:48:59 PM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie; Count of Monte Logan
Which McCain are you voting for? ... The McCain of 2003 who was for the war.

No more threat of Saddam seeking WMD's is there?

The McCain of 2004 for the war against how it was run.

How many of us have been railing for years about how the war started with Shock and Awe and then was fought with one hand tied behind our backs?

The McCain of 2005 for the war but wanted 250,000 more American “boots on the ground”

If a Surge of that magnitude had been carried out in 2005, the war might very well have been wrapped up by now. As it was, lack of progress in the war allowed the Democrats to gain control of Congress with Cut & Run promises and we are now one Presidential election away from losing a war that should have ended with victory already.

The McCain of 2006. Fathers the Baker Commission. Wants to cut a political deal with Iran and Syria so the USA could slink away from Iraq

Do you make up this Bravo Sierra, MNJohnnie, or does somebody else make it up for you?

This was McCain really said about the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group:

"I understand the polls show only 18 percent of the American people support my position. But I have to do what's right, what I believe is right and what my experience and knowledge and background tells me is the right thing to do in order to save this situation in Iraq... In war, my dear friends, there's no such thing as compromise. You either win or you lose." - Sen. John McCain

The McCain of 2007. Presidential Campaign dead in the water. McCain has surrogates fraudulent start claiming HE was the real father of the Surge strategy.

Well, here is an article dated December, 2006 where even conservative columnist Robert Novak is saying that McCain's pushing of the Surge was costing him politically.

Novak: McCain's 'aggressive surge' stance backfiring

So, Count of Monte Logan, which McCain is the real McCain?

The McCain whose actual positions are documented by the historical record or the McCain of MNJohnnie's creative writing?

192 posted on 02/04/2008 11:12:17 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson