That wasn't my question, but thank you anyways.
As Petitioners note, preambles are examined only “[i]f words happen to still be dubious.”Those were in #85 too. Is it giving you difficulty?...
Preambles are “properly resorted to, where doubts or ambiguities arise upon the words of the enacting part; for if they are clear and unambiguous, there seems little room for interpretation, except in cases leading to an obvious absurdity, or to a direct overthrow of the intention expressed in the preamble.”