Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

Oh, I think what they did was quite enough.

The court here is caught on the horns of a delemma,
they can find to keep the assorted restrictive infringments
or they can find for the people. Supporting laws that clearly are in opposition to our constitution and bill of rights will find those laws ignored by the majority of the
populace who will find a way to restore those rights.

One way or another.


110 posted on 02/04/2008 4:13:13 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: tet68
Supporting laws that clearly are in opposition to our constitution and bill of rights will find those laws ignored by the majority of the populace who will find a way to restore those rights.
Exactly.

Case in point, when a pro-slavery SCOTUS "settled" the slavery issue, once and for all, back in Dred Scott v. Sanford.

111 posted on 02/04/2008 4:16:36 PM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson