Posted on 02/04/2008 5:51:05 AM PST by jdm
Winston Churchill didnt really exist, say teens
By Aislinn Simpson
Last Updated: 1:53am GMT 04/02/2008
A fifth of British teenagers believe Sir Winston Churchill was a fictional character, while many think Sherlock Holmes, King Arthur and Eleanor Rigby were real, a survey shows.
Glory days of the Navy captured by a serving sailor
The canvass of 3,000 under-twenties uncovered an extraordinary paucity of basic historical knowledge that older generations take for granted.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/04/nhistory104.xml
They can most likely tell you everything you need to know about Princess Di though!!!
You need not worry. The British response to your statement would be, "Camps? What camps?"
Actually, almost every Northern Democrat voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The opposition came from Southern Democrats and strict constitutionalist Republicans.
You are correct, sir!
Blimey mate, I don’t know where to start. You seem to see my desire to not have my country slandered as criticism of the US for some reason. I love the US and have never said anything to the contrary. Forgive me for trying to defend the UK!
To address your points:
1) Islamic murderers are not rioting in Britain’s streets. We have a Muslim population the same size as that of the US (as a proportion of the population). Radicals have been jailed like any other thugs/criminals.
2) Britain is under a Labour government (a left-leaning party) at the moment. That has still not stopped us from being the only US ally to be committing substantial combat forces to Iraq and Afghanistan.
3) Re: The Falklands. I know that the US helped the UK with intelligence and AIM-9L air-to-air capability, for which we were very grateful. I, however, fail to see how Britain having its territory invaded and then recapturing it with a numerically inferior force against a dug-in enemy amounts to ‘getting our asses in a crack’? I have every respect for your military service and would be very interested to hear what your involvement in that conflict was. However, given how stretched the UK military is actively helping its US friends on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan it seems a bit harsh to begrudge us the logistical and technical aid offered by the US in the Falklands.
4)I have great respect and thanks for all Americans, including your uncles and father, who fought in Europe in World War Two. However, given that Britain stood alone against the Nazi Juggernaut for two years, it is highly insulting to slander our WW2 generation in the way that you have.
5)”All I know about your country is we kicked your sorry asses back across the Atlantic, founded our own Republic.” Well, more specifically Brit and European settlers fought third-tier British reserves and German mercenaries (and each other). There was great sympathy for the Americans in Britain. To the UK, it was a rather insignificant skirmish whilst our main effort (and first and second tier military) was focussed on the fight against other world powers such as France. In 1812, the US tried to invade Canada and got whooped by outnumbered Brits and Canadians and ended the War hundreds of miles inside their own territory with the White House burned down.
4)’So much for the empire.’ Funnily enough, the British empire ended not with chaos but with the ordered transfer of power in UK colonies to locals. There was no real violence (where it did occur, the UK military successfully stamped it out-see Malaya). Many of these territories are friendly commonwealth countries. A key factor in the UK deciding to scale back its overseas possessions were the crippling economic debts of WW1 and 2 (the UK only managed to repay huge WW2 loans to the US last year).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.