Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Digital Sniper; george76; USF; Fred Nerks
Of course, everyone knows what the penalty is for having multiple wives.
That's right...multiple mothers-in-law.

LOL

I was just curious why a man would want FOUR wives? I've always been under the impression that most think ONE wife is More than enough!

Of course for muslims it's different...wives are property, not partners!

29 posted on 02/03/2008 1:43:48 PM PST by jan in Colorado ("It's easier to believe a lie one hears 1,000 times than to believe a fact that one has never heard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: jan in Colorado
I was just curious why a man would want FOUR wives?

Well, if the stealer of tax money is going to give you some other peoples money to sleep with four different women, good work if you can get it! (stupid is as stupid does)Who says you have to stick around much?

36 posted on 02/03/2008 2:13:51 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: jan in Colorado

...to understand this development in the UK one has to know something of the long history of government ‘welfare’ in that nation. The ‘poms’ who came to Australia as migrants in the fifties and sixties were already a generation of welfare recipients, expecting free (council) housing, ‘unemployment’ benefits and free health care as their right. (And dental care, that’s why ‘poms’ have such rotten teeth...they would rather see their children’s teeth rot than pay for a dentist.)

Militant unionism was also part of their mindset. They earned themselves the name ‘whinging poms’ and thankfully, many returned after a period of quite disgusting behaviour, their open criticism of Australian society earned them no friends, they literally created a sub-class of their own choosing. But why did they come to Australia?

Because it only cost them ten english pounds per head and many saw the journey as a cheap adventure.

Yes, many did assimilate eventually, but we still have remnants of their militancy in our unions to date - and if a local ‘pom’ can’t be found to stir things up in the labour front, the Unions IMPORT a ‘suitable’ thug from the UK.

The muslims in the UK are not doing anything but taking advantage of what already exists in the system, they are stretching it. And it’s quite acceptable to the ‘poms’ because the majority are totally in favour of ‘getting the government to pay’ -

I cannot recall his name, but there was an ‘imam’ who was deported from the UK, he expected to be allowed to return for heart surgery. I recall the government purchased a vehicle for his family at the cost of thirty thousand sterling - because his family was too large to fit into an ordinary sedan...

Get the picture?

It’s no surprise to an Aussie to read about welfare for four muslim wives...not after our experience with the whinging poms whose entire families expected to be supported by the taxpayer. The poms won’t complain nor take any action because they are on the take themselves!

(PS. Apologies to those from Great Britain who don’t fit the mould.)


41 posted on 02/03/2008 3:28:55 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: jan in Colorado; george76

see what I mean about the ‘poms’?

http://www.bigpond.com/news/offbeat/content/20080204/2153628.asp

Britons are losing their grip on reality, according to a poll which shows nearly a quarter think Winston Churchill was a myth, while the majority reckon Sherlock Holmes was real.

The survey found that 47 per cent thought the 12th Century English King Richard the Lionheart was a myth.

And 23 per cent thought World War II prime minister Winston Churchill was made up.

The same percentage thought Crimean War nurse Florence Nightingale did not actually exist.

Three per cent thought Charles Dickens, one of Britain’s most famous writers, is a work of fiction himself.

Indian political leader Mahatma Gandhi and Battle of Waterloo victor the Duke of Wellington were also in the top 10 of people thought to be myths.

Meanwhile, 58 per cent thought Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s fictional detective Sherlock Holmes actually existed, and 33 per cent thought the same of WE Johns’ fictional pilot and adventurer Biggles.

UKTV Gold television surveyed 3,000 people.


58 posted on 02/03/2008 10:03:06 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson