Oh, I will answer this, though: Like somewhere north of 80% of Americans under 30, she didn't fill out a living will because she didn't imagine she would be brain daamaged before her 30th birthday.
But I'm mystified at the idea that you think the law says that because she didn't do that she should be saddled with an unfit guardian and starved to death.
You clearly know that I've never said that she SHOULD be saddled with the situation as it was.
I can only conclude, that like wagglebee, you are not as certain of your position as you might like everyone to think.
Otherwise, why the constant misrepresentation of my position? You cannot win the arguement on it's own merits, you must compose little lies about those who think differently? Evidently.