As you said before though; cost is not really the issue here. It is a problem that needs to be addressed without a doubt but it's not directly a Pro-Life issue. Yet. The more government gains control of health care budgets the more it will become a Pro-Life ethics issue.
Since Lauren’s parents have not brought up the issue of money (and they seem to have money to spend on attorneys, etc.), we must assume that it is not a factor for them. I posted a link to pictures (some of which the judge has now ordered Mr. Richardson to remove) that show her in front of what appears to be a fairly nice home with a show-quality classic sports car.
Many upper middle class families have the means to spend $31,000 per year without any government help (though they would certainly receive a portion of it back as a medical expense on their tax return). It might mean a less extravagant lifestyle, but it can be done.