For the sake of discussion, we should separate the actual ruling from what the media said about it. We all know what the media want, irrespective of reality, so we should expect their reporting to be biased in favor of gay marriage.
While a healthy skepticism for the media is a good thing, it isn’t good at grand conspiracies. But if it helps, just look at what the media says the anti-gay-marriage people were saying after the ruling.
You won’t find any of this “ruling is meaningless” stuff, you’ll see the community screaming about how they had instituted gay marriage, and how we needed a constitutional amendment to stop them.
It’s only a few mitt-haters who now claim that we needed NOTHING to stop them.
Alan Keyes has it exactly right.
The only other case in the modern era that is as destructive to our form of government and of our most important fundamental institutions than Mitt Romney’s lawless and unconstitutional implementation of gay marriage in Massachusetts was that of Terri Schiavo.