McCain Makes Headway With Conservative Wing

Wall Street Journal ^ | 2 February 2008 | ELIZABETH HOLMES

[ricks_place]

Hillary or Obama would never appoint a conservative and constitutional judge. Every one of their appointments will be vetted by the ACLU, NARAL, and NAMBLA. Election 2008 may require a "Defensive" McCain vote even with the uncertainty of McCain judicial appointments.

[Beagle8U]

I know he did but the voters that walked away were mostly the blue collar gun voters.

Since the time that the NRA started endorsing candidates no Republican POTUS nominee has ever won without the NRA endorsement.

Gun voters are what won the congress in 94 and they are the reason Gore lost in 2000.

When the RATS went nuts with their anti-gun BS they lost a huge chunk of their base.

Those “Reagan Democrats” or swing voters will go back to the RATS every time Republicans run an anti-gun candidate.

Romney and Rooty had zero chance of being elected as a Republican the day they started running.

That single issue ( although there are others ) killed any chance they had.

Even Bill Clinton is on record admitting that.

[TAdams8591]

"WTF is going on with this MSM consipiracy to make it a Hill vs. McCain race??? I’m sick of the media’s manipulation."

I'm surprised at the WSJ. They made it so obvious. All the candidates are smiling in their drawings, BUT Mitt.

Now I know he's not the entire paper, but isn't John Fund against nominating McCain?