Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee: This is not a two-man GOP race
CBS News ^ | February 1, 2008 | Joy Lin

Posted on 02/01/2008 5:40:31 PM PST by Kurt Evans

Conservative, conservative, conservative. That was the word Mike Huckabee used again and again with reporters to emphasize his credibility as a contender for the Republican nomination...

“There has been somewhat of - almost a national media spin that this race is a two-man race,” said Huckabee... “Last night, the CNN debate was very frustrating for me. There seemed to be an unequal level of time that was allocated, and if people look at the delegate count, one has to have 1,191 delegates in order to be the nominee. So far, no one has even broken a hundred; there’s only 8% of the delegates that have yet been tabulated ..."

Continuing, Huckabee questioned Romney’s quest to claim the conservative mantle: “If people are looking for a true conservative, somebody who hasn’t had a recent change of opinion to become one, I would be the logical choice ..."

Although he would have “loved” to have Arnold Schwarzenegger’s endorsement, Huckabee seemed to undermine it by challenging the California governor’s conservative credentials, and implicitly, McCain’s.

“I would never have expected the governor of California to endorse me and, frankly, I’m probably a lot more conservative on a lot more issues than he would have been comfortable with – whether it’s the Second Amendment, or pro-life issue, or marriage amendment issue or any number of things.”

Huckabee later said that receiving former Republican candidate Duncan Hunter’s endorsement last week probably meant more in the conservative hotbed of San Diego than Schwarzenegger’s endorsement of McCain.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; arnoldschwarzenegger; dealwithmclame; duncanhunter; elections; gop; huckabee; johnmccain; mccain; mikehuckabee; mittromney; primaryspoiler; prolife; romney; romneyrealtruthfile; schmuckabee; stepasidemike; suckabee; taxhikemike; timetocloseshop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: mylife

Romney is the only one who has successfully managed a business. Romney is the only one who is consistantly attacked by the MSM. Huckabee and McCain have a zero percent chance of being a good president. Romney for all his faults has maybe a 30% chance of being a good president.


41 posted on 02/01/2008 6:21:11 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

The truth? oh pahlease.
Huck and truth do not belong in the same sentence.


42 posted on 02/01/2008 6:21:12 PM PST by donnab (don't blame me ...I supported Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes

“Huckabee later said that receiving former Republican candidate Duncan Hunter’s endorsement last week probably meant more in the conservative hotbed of San Diego than Schwarzenegger’s endorsement of McCain.”

Well, Duncan Hunter doesn’t show me much by this. Is Duncan anti-Mormon, too? I just don’t see why he wouldn’t be backing Romney, who is pro-life and a GOOD MAN. I’m skeptical about that Huckabee, because of his flip-flops on the issues.


43 posted on 02/01/2008 6:21:26 PM PST by tcw_laj4ALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

Did we?

Did we REAAALY?

He was defeated by his own hubris.

If WE really had an impact, a REAL impact then Hunter or Thompson would have been far more than a fizzel.

Hunter did not even break 2000 votes in the SC and Mich primaries combined.

From day 1 this election has been about vote splitting. Not getting the majority but about splitting off by distraction enough of your opponents potential votes in order to win a plurality.

Split the libertarians with kook paul.
Split the evangelicals with huckster.
even split the conservatives with Thompson.

Now when this is in fact a two man race, the only reason for Huckabee to stay in is for personal power. He is pulling a jesse jackson.


44 posted on 02/01/2008 6:22:57 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

I find it amusing that you jump to conclusion without proper investigation...but then that might be why you support Huck.
Just and FYI..
I don’t listen to Rush. I do my own research. And I don’t do it from the candidates own propaganda site.


45 posted on 02/01/2008 6:23:33 PM PST by donnab (don't blame me ...I supported Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: detective

“Romney is the only one who is consistantly attacked by the MSM.”

We all know that the MSM likes whoever is most liberal. Their lack of attacks on both McCain and Huckabee show that they:

1. Know that Romney is the most conservative.
2. Romney has the best chance of receiving the majority of votes from the conservative base, and therefor the best chance of winning against either Hillary or Obama.


46 posted on 02/01/2008 6:24:56 PM PST by tcw_laj4ALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

And a phony and a disgrace to the human race.


47 posted on 02/01/2008 6:25:55 PM PST by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tear gas; Jim Robinson

“If you want to feel good about something, remind yourself that we defeated Rudy this year!”

Amen to that, and God bless Jim Robinson.

But this isn’t the time to stop fighting. Every inch counts. Every delegate counts. Most of Governor Huckabee’s delegates are extremely conservative, fiscally AND socially. Let’s get as many of them as possible to the convention.


48 posted on 02/01/2008 6:26:30 PM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Well, I think we killed the conservative candidates, too. Why didn't people who call themselves conservative (e.g., Rush Limbaugh) endorse one of the conservative candidates? Could we have done more to force them to make endorsments?

Maybe we could have done more.

49 posted on 02/01/2008 6:26:45 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans
So I guess Huckabee and Ronald Reagan were pro Abortion too.

Both were Governors, both allowed abortion clinics to run in their states, even though all three were personally opposed abortion. (How many kids dos Romney have? Five? Six? How many did his wife abort?)

So I guess your voting for Romney? You support him too? Correct?

50 posted on 02/01/2008 6:28:21 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

Do we want to force talk show hosts to endorse a candidate?- that’s stupid. If you listen enough to their shows, you will know which candidates they favor, and with their discussion on the candidates and your own research into these candidates, anyone should be able to make up their minds who to vote for. Why do you want to bully talk show hosts in that way? I got so tired of people complaining this season about hosts not endorsing Thompson. (Even though I was planning on voting for Thompson.)


51 posted on 02/01/2008 6:32:34 PM PST by tcw_laj4ALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans
It’s a very powerful piece by Governor Huckabee. But it’s all about people. In this case it’s about painting a negative picture about Romney. Yes, it’s good. Con men are good at talking about people also. People aside, I haven’t heard much of substance from Huckabee.

My recollection of Reagan speaking was that he relied on valid abstractions about freedom, free markets, and the totalitarian nature of communism. Of course, he had to interact with individuals. But even his jibes related to policy. He was never so personal as what I’ve heard, and just read, from Huckabee. Maybe President Huckabee will slime Muslim supremacists into renouncing terrorism. Maybe his energy policy will be to hammer our greedy oil industry while closing off more supplies. Supply and demand is pretty abstract and beyond some Republicans and most Democrats. I bet Huckabee will be very effective in inveighing against greed. I wonder where his "Jesus juice" will lead him next.

52 posted on 02/01/2008 6:33:24 PM PST by ChessExpert (This enemy is more dangerous than any threat we faced in the 20th century, LTG Sanchez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

Legality of Huckabee’s Mexican consulate deal questioned
Critics say Arkansas citizens, businesses financed office to draw illegal workers

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58455

As WND reported yesterday, critics in Arkansas charge Huckabee, who lately has enjoyed a surge in his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, worked with some of the state’s most prominent and politically powerful businesses to establish the consulate as a magnet for drawing illegal immigrants to the state to accept low-paying jobs.


53 posted on 02/01/2008 6:36:03 PM PST by khnyny (Quid Est Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

“Romney is the only one who is consistantly attacked by the MSM.”

You’ve been brain-Rushed. Most liberal journalists are spinning this as a two-way race between Senator McCain and Governor Romney. Chris Matthews has been absolutely fawning over Governor Romney while engaging in a virtual blackout of Governor Huckabee.

Rasmussen’s national numbers for today show Senator McCain at 30 percent, Governor Romney at 28 percent, and Governor Huckabee at 21 percent. Some Super Tuesday forecasts show Governor Huckabee and Governor Romney coming out with 200-250 delegates apiece. Now compare those realities to CNN’s allocation of attention during the Reagan Library debate.

Liberal journalists with brains can see that a McCain-Romney final is a no-lose situation for the Democrat nominee.


54 posted on 02/01/2008 6:37:29 PM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

part of the reason for the failure was the fact that we have no MSM voice.

FNC utterly and totally failed the viewers.

Rush at least has a very good logic to his not endorsing. He is loyal to being conservative. IOW he encourages cream to rise to the top and pushes the waste to the bottom.

Hence why he can expose mccain. But that is he PERSONAL choice on his PERSONAL show. He is only one person.

We have no outlet on TV. NONE.

There is no hard news outlet. We have been left to surfing the three big news stations to sift whatever we can read between the coverate and question why something is NOT being covered (see thompson)

FR has only a few hundred thousand reach. Nowhere near what is needed to be a uniting social force for conservatives. (not to mention the kooky trolls that appear either paid or volunteer)


55 posted on 02/01/2008 6:39:46 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: donnab

“Huck and truth do not belong in the same sentence.”

You’ve been brain-Rushed:

“I got to know Governor Huckabee well on the campaign trail,” said Hunter...
“Mike Huckabee is a man of outstanding character and integrity.”


56 posted on 02/01/2008 6:40:02 PM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tcw_laj4ALL
Do we want to force talk show hosts to endorse a candidate?- that’s stupid.

Do we want to force airplane pilots to fly airplanes?

Do we want to force quarterbacks to play football?

Do we want to force talk show hosts to express opinions?

No, of course not.

Don't look now, but Rush gets paid to express opinions. The truth is he was afraid to endorse a candidate because he's a Rudy lover and he knew how that would go over. I'm disgusted with Rush.

57 posted on 02/01/2008 6:41:33 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tcw_laj4ALL

“I just don’t see why he wouldn’t be backing Romney, who is pro-life and a GOOD MAN.”

Take five minutes out of your life, and watch your “good man” in action:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4


58 posted on 02/01/2008 6:42:09 PM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

I won’t be surprised if people start taking a second look at Huckabee. I think more and more people are beginning to realize that the so-called conservative leaders are tryin to sell us snake oil in the form of Romney and McCain.


59 posted on 02/01/2008 6:44:52 PM PST by conservit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

The MSM has consistantly praised McCain as a maverick and a man of integrity. Many stories say he is the only chance the Republicans have to win.
The NYT and other publications have done many positive pieces on Huckabee.
All the profiles of Romney by the MSM have benn negative.


60 posted on 02/01/2008 6:46:24 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson