[SERIOUSLY!!!!!!! THIS IS NOT THE TIME IN HISTORY TO TEACH THE PARTY A LESSON. DON’T GIVE THE MEN AND WOMEN ON THE FRONT LINES THE BIG FINGER BY HANDING THE WH TO HILLARY OR OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]
Yep...
Yet so many here are willing to let her be prident because they want to teach the party a lesson. How about standing up against communism??? How about standing up for the WOT and NEVER letting Hillary near the WH????
SERIOUSLY!!!!!!! THIS IS NOT THE TIME IN HISTORY TO TEACH THE PARTY A LESSON. DON’T GIVE THE MEN AND WOMEN ON THE FRONT LINES THE BIG FINGER BY HANDING THE WH TO HILLARY OR OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think you are on the right track. It’s not just about what Hillary is about vs. a Rep nominee. It’s about the completely discredited morons (e.g., Strobe Talbott) that are lurking in the shadows for Dem administration positions.
As much as I love Ann Coulter, I think she is very shortsighted to make a simple comparison between the anti-conservative MCain and the communist Clinton. Think about how many people the POTUS puts in important policy positions. If McLame is only marginally better than PIAPS, multiple that by the number of appointments that the POTUS makes.
I despise McCain on many levels, but I will vote for him if he is the nominee. The last martyr who made a real difference was Jesus Christ. Get the picture?
Nice revision.
The GOP gave the finger to the troops and to conservatives. If the GOP wants to get elected by conservatives then they should start acting like conservatives.
It's not the voters fault that the politicians are RINOs.
SERIOUSLY!!!!!!! THIS IS NOT THE TIME IN HISTORY TO TEACH THE PARTY A LESSON. DON’T GIVE THE MEN AND WOMEN ON THE FRONT LINES THE BIG FINGER BY HANDING THE WH TO HILLARY OR OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(I have one child, and he is now an adult in the U.S. Army. He just spent his 25th birthday in a freezing hooch in Afghanistan. He spent his 23rd in a tent in Iraq, which was probably like old times, because he had turned 21 in Iraq. Make no mistake about my concern for American troops; it is real, it is overwhelming, it is enduring and it is very, very personal.)
I will not be led to believe that John McCain cares about American troops much more than Hillary Rodham Clinton or Barak Obama, other than that he will publicly exhibit less disdain for them. Were John McCain to inadvertently lose the veneer of his "support for the troops," then his media-conferred eternal war hero status would avail him very little, and the self-deluded within the GOP would turn their backs on this man who has consoistently made our active-duty troops' mission(s) increasingly difficult (while burnishing his own "maverick credentials"). Unlike the 'rat candidates who also hamstring the mission, McCain knows how to wave the bloody BDU in front of select audiences. What McCain did in regard to POW-MIA issues along with his good friend John Kerry is a damning testament to how much he "cares." If John McCain perceives personal benefit from punting the WOT, he'd punt the WOT faster than you can say "Keating," and sacrifices past/future be damned.
As for fighting communism, there is apparently nothing left in either major political party to fight it with other than another form of communism. Sort of a Sunni-Shia lineup. McCain and the remora-like Mike Huckabee (symbiosis in action) both spout milk-sop manifestos of watered-down socialist statism in quantities that would do FDR proud. If a person is going to pick a hill to die on in the war against communism (or the corollary of oligarchy), John McCain is among the very least deserving of the sacrifice.
I will no longer let them - to paraphrase Al Gore - play on my fears. If John McCain and the GOP think they can hold active duty troops as some sort of hostage in exchange for my vote, they don't know me, my wife or my son.
Mr. niteowl77
Reagan We win, they lose
We America
They communists
Hillary We win, they lose
We communists
They us