Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mmichaels1970

Has anyone considered the possibility that these gentlemen were being purposefully ironic?

Of COURSE such a ridiculous Bill will not get passed, as should NOT such ridiculous laws as anti-smoking bills, seat belt laws, helmet laws, gun storage laws, etc. They ALL interfere with individual liberty.

It’s only a matter of whose ox is getting gored (or pig, in this case).

Isn’t it at least POSSIBLE that they are trying to make a point about government run amok?


62 posted on 02/01/2008 1:28:11 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS

That was the first thing that crossed my my mind—Mississippi is the last state where a law like this would find favor with either party.


64 posted on 02/01/2008 1:29:33 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: WayneS
Has anyone considered the possibility that these gentlemen were being purposefully ironic?

Yes. See post #49. I hope this is the case. I did read the bill several times before posting. I'd guess The Smoking Gun did as well. In either case, whether it is serious or ironic, to me it still sends a message about where we are heading if we allow our government to continue to "run amok".
68 posted on 02/01/2008 1:33:27 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: WayneS; All
Here is another link.

Representative Mayhall admits he does not think his bill would pass but that it was, indeed,a serious effort on his part because of the “urgency of the obesity crisis and need for government action."
72 posted on 02/01/2008 1:36:09 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: WayneS

“I called lead author, Rep. Mayhall, and asked if this was serious legislation or tongue-in-cheek to make a point. He kindly took a moment to answer my question while the legislature was in session. He said that while, regrettably, he doesn’t believe his bill will pass, this is serious. He wrote it, he said, because of the ‘urgency of the obesity crisis and need for government action.’ He hopes it will ‘call attention to the serious problem of obesity and what it is costing the Medicare system.’”

http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/01/no-fat-people-allowed-only-slim-will-be.html


73 posted on 02/01/2008 1:36:14 PM PST by ellery (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice - B. Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: WayneS

> Has anyone considered the possibility that these gentlemen were being purposefully ironic? <

You nailed it. It’s long been clear to me that your typical Yankee often has trouble appreciating the sense of humor of a good ole boy from the Magnolia State!


88 posted on 02/01/2008 3:08:37 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson