Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commentary: Doing away with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (Replacing With The Fair Tax)
helium.com ^ | Ken Hoagland

Posted on 02/01/2008 12:06:25 PM PST by Man50D

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-245 next last
To: lucysmom

If that’s the case, which I HIGHLY DOUBT, we can return to the income tax.

This has been a dalliance with Marxism that the country will not soon forget.


101 posted on 02/02/2008 11:21:44 AM PST by DivaDelMar (CRAm member-- (Conservative Republicans Against mcCain) Think you're entitled to my vote? CRAm It!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: DivaDelMar
The “first step” hasn’t even made it to committee, or even garnered 15% support in one house, so repealing a constitutional amendment is a bit of a stretch, at least in the mind of any thinking person...
102 posted on 02/02/2008 11:27:50 AM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Maintaining the income tax are your words. Other than in you own mind, where did anyone commit to maintaining the income tax?

What other possible result could there be if we don't adopt the FairTax? We've tried income tax reform over and over again. It simply doesn't work.

You mean besides it doesn't exist and has never been tried

Is that your reason not to try? Is that it? We'd still be in the dark ages with attitudes such as that.

If your answer is there are 45 states that have sales taxes that work great, why doesn't the Fairtax even remotely resemble ONE of them?

Because the FairTax is a national tax. It has to replace such things as income taxes on gov't employees. It would be fine with me to simply add a percentage to the sale and forget it. How about you?

All the rest...

You and your comrades always like to say that but you can't name a single one other than Bruce Bartlett. Where are the names?

What's to be against yet? It's a non-starter that doesn't exist and would be a total waste of time at this point....Unless of course there's some money or other compensation in it for them.

What was in it for the 75 who signed the letter?

You choose to let economists guide your way...I'm not impressed by their profession or their predictions...You are, so be it.

Who else to expertly judge the merits of a method of taxation? It is an economic issue. Believe it or not we don't adhere to lewislynn's economic thinking.

103 posted on 02/02/2008 11:31:17 AM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: groanup
What other possible result could there be if we don't adopt the FairTax?
You don't know any other way therefore there is no other way?
Is that your reason not to try? Is that it? We'd still be in the dark ages with attitudes such as that.
It's not like we're going to try to build a rocket that if it doesn't work there'd be no harm. What government policies brought us out of the dark ages?
Because the FairTax is a national tax. It has to replace such things as income taxes on gov't employees.
HUH?

It would be fine with me to simply add a percentage to the sale and forget it. How about you?

How about me what? We've already established where I stand on the Fairtax...How many times do you have to keep asking the same stupid questions? Other than potentially using the answer against them, why does it even matter?...You support it, not everyone else does, get over it.

You and your comrades always like to say that but you can't name a single one other than Bruce Bartlett. Where are the names?.....
What part of "It's a non-starter that doesn't exist and would be a total waste of time at this point" do you not understand?
What was in it for the 75 who signed the letter?
I know that like you know they actually studied the legislation and not the rhetoric. I know that like you and they know there would be (yet to be defined) 100% paychecks and certain price reductions
Believe it or not we don't adhere to lewislynn's economic thinking.
If you knew what it was you might, or you might and don't know it...I didn't know the Fairtax was the end all to all economic thinking...It truly is a cult if that's the case.
104 posted on 02/02/2008 12:23:13 PM PST by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movemractent have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Not an answer, but an observation

“Who doesn’t like the FT”

The NTU
Herritage Foundation
CATO institute
FreedomWorks
The New Economist
All emerging democratic economies
The National Retail Federation

Just to name a couple

105 posted on 02/02/2008 12:27:04 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Links, please.


106 posted on 02/02/2008 1:20:35 PM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
Try Here
107 posted on 02/02/2008 1:27:42 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
You spend hours here demonizing the FairTax. What is your alternative? What are you doing to get the IRS albatross off of our necks? What are you doing to rid Washington of the tax lobbyists and the reason for their existence?

What government policies brought us out of the dark ages?

Freedom. Something that started being eroded in 1865, took a big hit in 1913 and began a downward spiral in the 1930's.

We've already established where I stand on the Fairtax...How many times do you have to keep asking the same stupid questions?

If congress made changes to the FairTax, would you support it? If you would, what changes would you like to see? If not, your differrences with it are very basic. What are they?

So an idea that has the volunteer support of over half a million people, has a very large organization and has become a part of two presidential candidates' platforms has not taken hold?

Does that mean that you have wasted years of days spent on these threads trying to minimize the FT?

I know that like you know they actually studied the legislation and not the rhetoric. I know that like you and they know there would be (yet to be defined) 100% paychecks and certain price reductions

My turn, HUH?

I didn't know the Fairtax was the end all to all economic thinking...It truly is a cult if that's the case.

There is a lot you don't know. Such as: people are truly tired of you SQL's calling the FT a cult. It really is passe' to do that.

108 posted on 02/02/2008 2:18:11 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

A couple of those are wrong. You won’t be able to prove anything until you post links to all of the list. Go ahead, we are waiting.


109 posted on 02/02/2008 2:19:49 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: groanup

Really?
Refute them then.

I am not inclined to waste too many more keystrokes on you.


110 posted on 02/02/2008 2:43:42 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: groanup
You spend hours here demonizing the FairTax. What is your alternative? What are you doing to get the IRS albatross off of our necks? What are you doing to rid Washington of the tax lobbyists and the reason for their existence?
I don't demonize the Fairtax. I point out the idiocy of the Fairtax, it demonizes itself.

Did I say it was an albatross on my neck? Do I care there are lobbyists? Once again just because you can't think of a reason for lobbyists after the Fairtax you think they won't exist. If I were you I'd look in the new Excise Tax Bureau for an ideal place for lobbyists under the Fairtax. What else do you think it's for, to count money from the sale of tires and fishing gear?

What government policies brought us out of the dark ages?

Freedom. Something that started being eroded in 1865, took a big hit in 1913 and began a downward spiral in the 1930's.
Oh brother, no wonder you fall for this crap. Since when is freedom a government policy?

In other words freedom is a government policy, we're now living in the dark ages compared to 1865...and 1913 and then it got worse after 1930...Brilliant reasoning there.

That's the kind of brilliant thinking I'm supposed to get behind to support the Fairtax? What a miserable life you must lead.

Just wondering, do you have any clients (left) that listen to this stuff from you?

111 posted on 02/02/2008 2:45:32 PM PST by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movemractent have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
"What a miserable life you they all must lead."
112 posted on 02/02/2008 2:50:28 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: groanup
If congress made changes to the FairTax, would you support it? If you would, what changes would you like to see? If not, your differrences with it are very basic. What are they?
I don't lay awake at night wondering about what changes I would make to the Fairtax. It isn't going to happen, if there are any changes to it, it won't be "the Fairtax" anymore will it.

The fact you always have to make the argument/subject about the person rather then the Fairtax says all it needs to say about what you really know about the Fairtax.

people are truly tired of you SQL's calling the FT a cult. It really is passe' to do that.
The hypocrisy in that statement also says a lot.
113 posted on 02/02/2008 3:02:45 PM PST by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movemractent have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Really? Refute them then.

Just as I thought. You have nothing to back up your claims. Well, I tried.

114 posted on 02/02/2008 3:10:41 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

Comment #115 Removed by Moderator

To: groanup
Not to be a dissenter her, but at first I wasn’t sure what to make of it (FT). But as I learn more about it, I like it more and more. There is a lot of talk about the FT forcing illegals to pay taxes when they purchase items. If the FT is passed, how do you think it will affect shamnesty? My fear is one conservative value will undermine another. Because, if we deport all of the illegals, it may give the shamnesty proponents the chance to say “what about all of the tax losses.” While I know (I should say believe) the illegals are a bigger drain through welfare, medicaid/care, etc... I fear the MSM will be able to spin this to their advantage. By the way, one of the posts scoffed about drug dealers registering for the FT. Did anyone notice the “legislation” they are proposing in NY? They want to tax marijuana and cocaine...the “dealer” buys the stamps ahead of the sale. Its $3.50 per grm of mj and $200.00 a grm of "other substances" like coke; regardless of purity. http://www.newsday.com/news/local/state/ny-stmari235548383jan23,0,7568888.story
116 posted on 02/02/2008 3:58:47 PM PST by Operation_Shock_N_Awe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
I really do thank you for being so kind as to give me the reference to the links I asked for. Just about what one could expect: The NTU ------------------------ 136,000
Herritage Foundation ----------- 2,660,000
CATO institute ----------------- 123,000
Freedom Works ------------------ 9,860
The New Economist -------------- 2,190,000
The National Retail Federation -- 127,000

I didn't take the time it would have required to go through all of the material on "All emerging democratic economies ", but, the total number of items listed for the other institutions named in the above list came to only 5,245,860.

I am sure you carefully purused each and every one of those items. Otherwise, I you would most assuredly have had the courtesy to reply to my request for links by citing those that you did actually read.

I now understand why you can't answer a question directly -- your mind is so crowded with information, it would just take too much of your time to sort through it all to find an answer to any question more complicated than your shoe size.

Thanks again.

117 posted on 02/02/2008 5:06:25 PM PST by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20; All
Does it hurt to be you?

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1866.cfm
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8217
http://www.freedomworks.org/informed/key_template.php?issue_it=17
http://neweconomist.blogs.com/new_economist/flat_tax/index.html
http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/food-stores/4485528-1.html

Countries with flat taxes: (recent)

Pausing for a brief countdown until the "none of that says anything" comments..

118 posted on 02/02/2008 5:30:35 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn; groanup
"Taxes should be uncomfortable. Not especially painful, mind you -- just a bit irritating. Enough to make you pay attention. Modest discomfort is an element of citizenship, reminding voters of the price they pay for civilized society."

(thank you, Justice Holmes)

119 posted on 02/02/2008 5:38:17 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
I don't demonize the Fairtax. I point out the idiocy of the Fairtax, it demonizes itself.

No, you practice true love toward it. LOL.

If it isn't generally accepted that the government is too tightly wound around everyone's neck, then what are we all doing on this board?

Once again just because you can't think of a reason for lobbyists after the Fairtax you think they won't exist.

You don't think that over 50% of lobbyists are there to garner tax favors?

I believe everyone has a right to petition the government. I don't believe the gov't has a right to rig a system where it favors certain citizens over others through an unfair tax code.

Oh brother, no wonder you fall for this crap. Since when is freedom a government policy?

You're right, it isn't. Just ask the citizens of N. Korea. YOU asked what government policies brought us out of the dark ages.

Just wondering, do you have any clients (left) that listen to this stuff from you?

What do my clients have to do with this? Is this a continuation of the discussion the mods spanked you about or is this a reasoned debate? Well, which is it?

120 posted on 02/02/2008 5:55:59 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson