Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RTO

TehRon is a strict surrenderist, too. Don’t forget that.


484 posted on 02/01/2008 8:48:56 AM PST by End Times Crusader (John McCain - Leadership for America ; Staying the course in the War on Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]


To: End Times Crusader

Wrong.

Dr. Ron Paul insists that you do not commit this nation to hostilities without a formal declaration of war made by the US Congress... EXACTLY what the Constitution mandates.

Of course, if we are going to continue saying “How high?” every time Israel screams jump, then we will never get out of the Middle East. If we are going to allow Saudi Arabia to yank our oil chain on a whim, play two-faced head games with us, and finance our debt, then we will never restore this nation to a Constitutional Republic.

Saudi and China own us, because we Americans are too stupid, too materialistic, and too comfortable in our luxuries to stop selling our children’s future in exchange for cheap oil, and products produced by slave labor.

BTW, what happened to those WMD’s that was the supposed reason we “needed” to “take out” Saddam Hussein... the same guy we armed to the teeth years before?

Did those nasty weapons get whisked away to Syria on Russian trucks, along with the Russian KGB ... oh, excuse me, I meant “FSB” ... “advisors” that were showing Saddam how to build and use them? Satellite photos say ‘YES’.... But we have not made “pre-emptive” war on Syria... or Russia. Guess GWB is not so courageous after all. Putin probably warned Bush the day old George “looked into his soul” and spoke thus: Screw with me chump, and I’ll turn your “compassinate” administration into a smoking hulk, along with about 90 percent of your country. Naturally the compassionate Dimwit just smiled and said “Thank you sir, may I have another?”

And again, with Osama Bin Laden: Why, if we suspect OBL is in Pakistan, do we not make “pre-emptive” war on Mushariff too? After all, did not GWB say (paraphrase) “If you harbor terrorist, then you are with the terrorist”? Oh, wait, I forgot... Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and they might shove one up our collective nation-building empire’s butt. BTW, just why are we funding another dictator? Hubris I guess.

Don’t preach about “surrender”… The establishment ‘R’ and ‘D’ jackasses running this nation should understand the lesson: If we would mind our own business, for once, perhaps we would not need bases in 130 frigging countries! That would be real “change.”

How would we Americans like the situation if Russia or China decided that we need to play the game by their rules? Suppose the Reds decided our nuclear arsenal was too grave a threat to THEIR national security? Suppose the two got together and decided to tag-team the US with a little pre-emptive strike? After all, GWB did set THE precedent. That would be REAL “shock and awe.” Now who’s to argue that any malcontent with a gripe is not justified to attack us, if they think themselves threatened by America.

Ron Paul is the only MAN standing, who actually has a scrotum filled with a substance that is not jelly, and something between his ears other than empty space.


591 posted on 02/01/2008 3:00:28 PM PST by RTO (What will you do without freedom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson