However, one quarter of all the infants were found to have a disability when they reached their first birthday. This proportion did not improve over the years.And so this means that they should be killed, then? PFFFT!
1 posted on
01/31/2008 7:25:19 PM PST by
Stoat
To: cpforlife.org; Coleus; cgk; narses; MHGinTN
2 posted on
01/31/2008 7:25:40 PM PST by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat
"Prof David Field, the president-elect of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine, said: "The viability of premature babies and abortion are completely different arguments that have been muddled up. You either believe in abortion or you don't." 'Professor' are they alive human beings? You either think they are and believe it's okay to slaughter them or you believe they are not to be slaughtered, OR you don't believe they are human beings in which case you're an ass to make an empoerment issue out of the slaughtering of 'not yet human beings' tissues.
3 posted on
01/31/2008 7:32:08 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Stoat
Hmmm, this claimed improvement doesn’t sound accurate given their rotten socialist health care system.
4 posted on
01/31/2008 7:52:44 PM PST by
mngran2
To: Stoat
These people are stretching the truth to fit their agenda. I take care of these little darlings and there is more joy and success than can be imagined.
To: Stoat
We are getting very close to the era when a fertilized egg will be able to develop to term and be born completely outside of a woman’s body. At this point, the whole “viability” argument becomes moot, and it gets back to the “humanity” argument.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson