Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transcript of Michael Reagan-John McCain Interview
CNS News ^ | 3-1-2000 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 01/31/2008 5:16:24 PM PST by Always Right

Talk show host Michael Reagan invited John McCain to call into Reagan's radio show on Tuesday, February 29. McCain obliged, and what follows is a transcript of their brief and tense conversation, aired nationally on more than 220 radio stations. This transcript was provided by the Bush for President Campaign.

Michael Reagan: This is an interview I tried to do earlier today with John McCain... It would be choosing the judges if John McCain becomes President of the United States, and will they be liberal judges, or will they be conservative judges? That's an issue many people would like to get an answer to. Is Warren Rudman going to be the Attorney General? That would be a good question to ask. Why don't we go now, Sen. John McCain. Senator, how are you?

John McCain: How are you?

Michael Reagan: I am just fine, thank you very much. Where are you, are you in Fresno?

John McCain: I'm on the bus, I'm on the way to Bakersfield, I'm headed through a lot of very beautiful fruit tree areas. It's very pretty here in the valley.

Michael Reagan: Question I want to ask you, first of all, have you decided now to get into the debate that's going to be taking place on Thursday night?

John McCain: We're having the debate, will be done by satellite from, we'll have to stop on our trip back to New York and we had to cancel some, some ah of our New York schedule, but we'll be there by satellite.

Michael Reagan: All right, let me ask you this, because I think it's an issue, just isn't being played out within the campaign, there's so many other things that are being talked about, but as President of the United States, one of the legacies you would leave would be the judges that you would appoint as President of the United States of America and there's some great concern if Warren Rudman, who is your overall campaign chair, would be in such a position in a McCain administration to appoint judges like Judge Souter to the bench as was done during the Bush administration back in the 1980s.

John McCain: Ah, Warren Rudman did not appoint Judge Souter, President Bush did, remember he was the president.

Michael Reagan: Yes, but ...

John McCain: Second of all, Warren Rudman is a fine, decent man who served his country in the Korean War, Attorney General of his state, and a Senator who was highly respected. It was, it was President Bush that appointed Justice Souter.

Michael Reagan: Right, but Warren Rudman...

John McCain: Warren Rudman is 70...let me finish, please, could I finish? Ah, ah, Warren Rudman is 70 years old, he's been, he had a serious illness. He's not interested in playing any active role in a McCain administration and I resent enormously phone calls that were made by Pat Robertson saying that he was a vicious bigot. I think that one might be...

Michael Reagan: Senator, Senator, Senator, Senator, Senator...

John McCain (talking over Reagan): ...well worth talking about as well...

Michael Reagan: Senator!

John McCain: I'm not...

Michael Reagan: Senator!

John McCain: I asked you, Michael, if I could finish, can I finish?

Michael Reagan: But you did finish... [McCain interrupts]

John McCain: Can I Finish? Can I finish? Yes or no?

Michael Reagan: What else do you have to say?

John McCain: Can I finish or not, I mean otherwise...

Michael Reagan: Go ahead.

John McCain: Okay. I don't appreciate having him being called a vicious bigot by Pat Robertson in personal phone calls to hundreds of thousands of Americans. He is a fine and decent man and he will play an advisory role to me because he is a fine and decent man who enjoyed a sterling reputation as United States Senator and Attorney General of the state of New Hampshire.

Michael Reagan: So...

John McCain: Now I'm finished.

Michael Reagan: Very good. And what I was trying to get to is the fact that, yes, Warren Rudman did not appoint him, Warren Rudman's the man who sold [him] to John Sununu, who sold him to President Bush at the time, and what...

John McCain (interrupting): In other words...

Michael Reagan: I want to find out.

John McCain: In other words, in other words, in other words, President Bush and John Sununu did not have any minds of their own. That's, I don't think that's the way it happened.

Michael Reagan: That's, Senator, let me ask you this. There are, there are...

John McCain (interrupting): I don't believe that's how it happened.

Michael Reagan: Well...

John McCain: John Sununu knew Souter just as well as Warren Rudman did, they're both from New Hampshire.

Michael Reagan (talking over McCain): The question is, the question is, what kind of judges would you appoint to the bench? Would they be Souter-like? Would they be judges in the make of a Bork, a Thomas? What kind of judges could we see from a President McCain?

John McCain: My record is very clear as to who I have supported and my record is very clear in public statements that Justice Scalia is a Justice that I admire very much. I also happen to admire Justice Rehnquist, Chief Justice Rehnquist, who is from the state of Arizona. And, ah, but Scalia I admire an enormous amount as well as others. My record as a conservative is very clear, my record on supporting people who adhere to the Constitution is very clear, and my record as a - 18-year record - of conservative positions both physically and others is also very clear.

Michael Reagan: All right. Next question, education. Big issue. I mean, compared to other industrial nations, we here in America, the children routinely test near the bottom. So what about your plan for a better-educated child here in America? What is the McCain plan?

John McCain: Choice, ah, by the way, before we go into that, ah, are you - it doesn't disturb you that Pat Robertson would call up people and say that, that ah, Warren Rudman is a vicious bigot? I'd like you to talk about that a little bit.

Michael Reagan: No, Senator. No, Senator. No, Senator, because let me tell you, I think that gets off...

John McCain (interrupting): No, let me tell you, let me tell you, when the man's name is maligned and his reputation is maligned then it ought to be talked about, okay? (inaudible)

Michael Reagan: Senator McCain, goodbye. (PAUSE) There you go, all he wants to talk about is Pat Robertson and bigotry. He doesn't want to talk about education. Didn't matter what question you asked him, he wanted, everything was an attack. Man does not have the temperament to be President of the United States. As somebody said, another hour of the show, said to me, you know, I know Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan's a friend of mine, etc., You ain't no Ronald Reagan. You ain't no Ronald Reagan. In your dreams, Senator McCain. In your dreams. Only in your dreams. Let's go to the phones, Mike, you're up.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: erratic; mcbama; mccain; mccainiac; mccaintruthfile; mchussein; mcinsane; mcjudges; mclame; mcqueeg; michaelreagan; rino; senile; talkradio; temper; warrenrudman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Astronaut

He’ll be stopped by either Obama or Hillary, as soon as they decide who gets the nomination. I’m waiting for one of them to apologize for having to criticize McCain for having a senior moment.


41 posted on 01/31/2008 7:47:24 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
slim pickens
42 posted on 01/31/2008 7:48:20 PM PST by redstateconfidential (If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Somebody needs to ask Joe Biden if he thinks McCain has "Presidential temperament".
I think McCain is a whack job, and I WILL NEVER vote for him.
43 posted on 01/31/2008 7:53:05 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; All

Can someone get this transcript into the hands of the Romney Campaign? McCain is NUTS!!!

No wonder Ann Coulter said she’d vote for Hillary if McCain gets the nomination.


44 posted on 01/31/2008 9:09:33 PM PST by no dems (Politcal Correctness is Fascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems; All
Is John McCain a war hero ?

Served US Army 1958 - 1964 E5 SP-5


45 posted on 01/31/2008 9:13:59 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redheemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CASchack
You got confirmation on that charge? I hate McCain as a politician; but have always heard he was a stand up guy as a P.O.W..

From Wiki.....

McCain was immediately offered a chance to return home early:[35] the North Vietnamese wanted a mercy-showing propaganda coup for the outside world, and a message that only privilege mattered that they could use against the other POWs.[39] McCain turned down the offer of repatriation due to the Code of Conduct of “first in, first out”: he would only accept the offer if every man taken in before him was released as well.[41] McCain’s refusal to be released was even remarked upon by North Vietnamese officials to U.S. envoy Averell Harriman at the ongoing Paris Peace Talks.[35]

46 posted on 01/31/2008 9:15:11 PM PST by allmendream ("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD (nocrybabyconservatives))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Are you serious? McCain kept on rambling about Pat Robertson instead of answering any kind of questions.


47 posted on 01/31/2008 9:20:24 PM PST by AllseeingEye33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AllseeingEye33

gee maybe mccain decided he’s not a ventriloquist’s dummy. he obviously was trying to get a message out against the pat robertson attacks.


48 posted on 01/31/2008 9:32:33 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
McCain is an ass. I honestly can't understand why otherwise good and descent people actually want this nut in the White House.

It baffles me.

49 posted on 01/31/2008 9:46:11 PM PST by TChris ("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; GOP_Lady

In all fairness to the liberal McAmnesty, sounds like Reagan was trying to provoke him and make a name for himself.

Can’t blame him (Reagan). It’s a tough name to live up to.


50 posted on 01/31/2008 10:02:39 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Holy MacManiac, Batman!


51 posted on 01/31/2008 11:59:02 PM PST by WOSG (RINO MCCAIN DOESNT FIT - VOTE FOR MITT - Another Conservative for Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I must say, just reading the transcript (not listening to it), it just sounds to me the McCain is stoutly standing up for a trusted friend. He doesn’t sound like a maniac.


52 posted on 02/01/2008 12:08:26 AM PST by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

wow....he argues even worse than I do.


53 posted on 02/01/2008 12:11:36 AM PST by wardaddy (Political Correctness is to Western Culture what the Aids virus is to the cake community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
In all fairness to the liberal McAmnesty, sounds like Reagan was trying to provoke him and make a name for himself.

There was zero provocation. All he did was mention Rudman's name in conjunction to a question about Supreme Court nominations and McCain went goofy on him. In fact, Reagan tried over and over again to change the subject to get McCain back on message, but McCain refused and kept going back to attacking Pat Robertson.

54 posted on 02/01/2008 4:04:11 AM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
I must say, just reading the transcript (not listening to it), it just sounds to me the McCain is stoutly standing up for a trusted friend.

Except Reagan never attacked Rudman in any way, so why did McCain get so insanely defensive about it?

55 posted on 02/01/2008 4:06:49 AM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BUSHdude2000

Thanks for the file. I received it and tried to post it to youtbe, but it was rejected because of format. Then I converted it to a mpeg file and it was still rejected. Then I converted it to an avi file and it was still rejected. May have to add the track to some pictures or something before they allow it to get posted. Probably try some more this weekend.


56 posted on 02/01/2008 4:58:53 AM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I saw it in this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1962874/posts

I don’t know what to make of it, but it is pretty serious if true.


57 posted on 02/01/2008 6:32:15 AM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

“Source for the Nancy Reagan endorsement, please. Don’t say it is Michael Medved because he said that Michael Reagan and Nancy Reagan endorsed McCain. I don’t think so!!”

There was a blurb on Drudge that said that Nancy ‘adores’ McCain but wouldn’t make a public endorsement of him.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1962719/posts

I doubt very seriously that Michael Reagan endorsed or would endorse McLame:

Michael Reagan: John McCain Hates Me
townhall.com ^ | January 31, 2007 | Michael Reagan
Posted on 01/31/2008 3:29:48 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers

Until last night, when I watched the Republican debate, I had no idea how much John McCain dislikes me and just about everybody else but Rudy Giuliani, who if you believe The New York Times is a pretty good hater himself.

As I watched McCain and Governor Romney go at it during the debate at the Reagan Library I was struck by the huge gap that separates McCain — whose contempt for his fellow humans is patently obvious — and my dad, Ronald Reagan, who had nothing but the deepest affection and respect for the American people.

The feeling is mutual between McCain and me. I don’t like the way he treats people. You get the impression that he thinks everybody is beneath him. He seems to be saying, “I was a war hero, and you had damn well better treat me as your superior.”

He has contempt for conservatives who he thinks can be duped into thinking he’s one of them, despite such blatantly anti-conservative actions as his support for amnesty for illegal immigrants, his opposition to the Bush tax cuts which got the economy rolling again, and his campaign finance bill which skewed the political process and attacked free speech.

More here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1962871/posts


58 posted on 02/01/2008 6:32:53 AM PST by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: merry10
Nancy Reagan endorsed him today.

You need to provide a source for this endorsement.

59 posted on 02/01/2008 6:38:18 AM PST by sandude (FreeRepublic put all of their eggs in Fred's broken basket, now we get Juan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Michael Reagan did not try to provoke him. I have the audio. Michael Reagan wanted to discuss the issues, McCain did not. Michael Reagan was indeed doing his job of asking questions of a presidential candidate. John McCain wanted to talk about what John McCain wanted to talk about and nothing else.


60 posted on 02/01/2008 6:41:27 AM PST by GOP_Lady (I'm a MITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson