Romney’s trip down the road to Damascus occured at an awful late, and convenient, time in his adult life and political career.
What makes more sense is that his support of abotion (including federal funding of it) and the homosexual agenda was a calculated move for his political future in Mass.
And that his “conversion” is a calculated move for his political future in D.C.
Unlike Paul, Mitt has not seen his entire life changed. Only his politics of opportunity.
I can admit that Romney likely paid lip service to supporting abortion, and for treating homo's decently, partially to get elected in liberal Massachusetts.
Was that smarmy? Yeah, I suppose so.
I also believe he, like many politicians, really DID have personal opposition .... but simply wanted to ease the fears of the far left liberal Democrats in that state.
He ended up losing in 1994 anyway.
Romney fought against government sanctioned homo marriage, and he vetoed embryonic stem cell research.
He supported several other ProLife positions while Governor, which is why he got an A-/B+ from the National ProLife organization.
Your claims that Romney was this total abortion rights person does not square with the facts.