Feel free to propel McCain then, because that’s what you are doing.
Good luck with that, I won’t take such steps to destroy our country, and our pro life message.
And further, I can see by you pinging your fellow Mormonism basher, your true motives have surfaced. I don’t think you meant to be that transparent.
Good night, no sandbox for me.
Hey, DWar, who I don't have much at all post contact with here at FReeperville, did an elaborate comparison of McCain vs. Romney earlier this week at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1960746/posts [see post #31 of that thread].
Now DWar assigned each candidate 0, 2, 5, 8 or 10 points re: 11 separate issues under security & defense; another 11 another fiscal; another dozen under "social values"; and then 4 sub-topics under "personal qualities."
Of his 38 comparisons, I immediately took issue with 3 just on a first-glance basis & told DWar that...but he said he took 3 weeks researching it...and when you add up his totals he was way pro-Romney...Romney came out on top over McCain 103-50 on security; 106-68 on fiscal; 97-69 on social values; and 33-31 on the other.
My point I'm getting to? Here, DWar's heavily slanted Romney eval (339 for Romney; 217 for McCain) still had the pair in a dead 5-5 tie on pro-life issues.
IOW, even objective folks who heavily research the issues & heavily side with Romney concede there's really no difference on the two pro-life wise.
Here, Huckabee's "points" on pro-life issues would swallow up both Romney & McCain together, and so it's quite ironic you accuse me of "destroy[ing]...our pro life message." Seven, to first have a pro-life message, ya gotta have a pro-life messenger, and when you look at Romney's comments on post #598 & #623...the GOP has no such messenger in Romney (or McCain for that matter...when push comes to shove, McCain would probably do the right thing...but as Rick Santorum has said, McCain is no leader on pro-life or any social issue)!