Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/31/2008 12:59:15 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Froufrou
strike targets two hundred miles away - still going at Mach 5

If true this gun could shoot down any orbiting satellite. It will likely require a nuclear power source but it could bury all its nuclear waste by shooting it into the Sun.

59 posted on 01/31/2008 1:25:13 PM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
nice .... with any luck they will also be able to scale it down to fast reload times to get smaller 3mm bullets or darts moving at mach 7. That will make a 20mm vulcan CWIS seem antiquated.

If it's just straight electricity look for surface warfare ships to turn into floating nuclear reactors with LOTS of ammo capabilities.

72 posted on 01/31/2008 1:32:38 PM PST by Centurion2000 (magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou; All

Update: They fired it.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327205,00.html

Cool pics at link.


77 posted on 01/31/2008 1:35:39 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; The majority are satisfied with a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
ble to shoot hypervelocity projectiles at a blistering Mach 7 and strike targets two hundred miles away - still going at Mach 5

I have a real issue with this claim. I call B.S. No way unless this thing is aimed to escape the atmosphere is it going to coast 200 miles and still be going Mach 5..............

79 posted on 01/31/2008 1:37:05 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
Here's a Navy Power Point Presentation on the project from 2006

One issue is barrel life. The objective is to get it to 100 shots. Currently you need to replace the barrel after just a few shots.

81 posted on 01/31/2008 1:37:36 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
Ever since the Battle of Midway, sailors have reluctantly been forced to accept that aircraft win sea battles, not ships.

Poppycock! Give me a U.S. submarine and I'll take on whole surface world. The biggest (and only real threat given a good team) to a submarine is another submarine.

88 posted on 01/31/2008 1:44:28 PM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou

111 posted on 01/31/2008 2:06:31 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou

bump


112 posted on 01/31/2008 2:08:21 PM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
Ping for the past. A 16 inch gun will throw the equivalent of a VW for 20 miles and hit a designated target. (It will also go through at least 24 inches of armour plate.) An old sailor remembers gunfire support from ships at sea.
117 posted on 01/31/2008 2:16:56 PM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou

Call me old school, but I say bring back the battleships launching projectiles the size of VWs into enemy cities. What’s the sense of attaining total air superiority without being able to park a row of battleships offshore with impunity.


133 posted on 01/31/2008 2:45:38 PM PST by MattinNJ (I have full blown Hillary Derangement Syndrome. I can't sit out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou

Wasn’t the Army shooting these things ten years ago, using a plastic projectile?


135 posted on 01/31/2008 2:48:40 PM PST by Does so (...against all enemies, DOMESTIC and foreign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
But railguns might demote aircraft carriers from their current big-dog naval status and bring in electric dreadnoughts as the capital ships of tomorrow

For this very reason, the wide spread use of railguns will never occur.

If it don't fly, it's not sexy and from everything I've heard, the navy brass is all about sexy.
137 posted on 01/31/2008 2:53:27 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
But railguns might demote aircraft carriers from their current big-dog naval status and bring in electric dreadnoughts as the capital ships of tomorrow, able to sweep the skies of pesky aircraft or missiles as soon as they dared show themselves above the horizon.Interesting:

China has since the 80's have an an ambition to build an aircraft carrier fleet to control more of the "blue water" open sea rather than "green water" china sea area and coastal waters.

There has been much speculation on how far the Chinese have come in building an aircraft carrier in secret. Nobody really knows for sure even if they have started

By the time China gets a fleet up and running, it will be obsolete.

Unless of course, whoever is the current Democrat occupant the WH sells them the railgun technology for a nice contribution, in complete violation of McCain-Feingold CFR

139 posted on 01/31/2008 3:00:02 PM PST by Popman (Gold Standard: Trying to squeeze a 50 lb economy back into a 5 lb bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou

But there are a lot of problems to be overcome. For one, the gun barrel tends to come apart after just a few shots
***Just a minor adjustment, har de har...


141 posted on 01/31/2008 3:07:52 PM PST by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
But there are a lot of problems to be overcome. For one, the gun barrel tends to come apart after just a few shots.

bummer

144 posted on 01/31/2008 3:26:04 PM PST by mjp (Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou

We demand that all testing and development on this weapon be halted until exhaustive tests can be carried out to determine possible impacts upon dolphins and polar bears. We might be able to deploy this weapon by 2070.

— The Democrap Party —


146 posted on 01/31/2008 4:02:58 PM PST by Enchante (Hillary Clinton: As a little girl near Chicago I always dreamed of the NY Giants in the SuperBowl!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
Now I know why the govt. labs were doing all the finite element modeling of hypervelocity penetrator impact back in the 90's.

And no, they weren't talking about what happens when my wife meets me after work. :-)

Cheers!

152 posted on 01/31/2008 5:07:38 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou; Brucifer; Eaker

rail gun ping


160 posted on 01/31/2008 7:21:33 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Froufrou
Here's another good video of a railgun test from last year: Railgun test shot
161 posted on 01/31/2008 8:59:25 PM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson