Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy to Test Fire Electric Hypercannon
register.com ^ | 01/30/08 | Unknown

Posted on 01/31/2008 12:59:13 PM PST by Froufrou

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-167 next last
To: Froufrou
Here's a Navy Power Point Presentation on the project from 2006

One issue is barrel life. The objective is to get it to 100 shots. Currently you need to replace the barrel after just a few shots.

81 posted on 01/31/2008 1:37:36 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Unfortunately, the insane cost of each Zumwalt (now estimated to be as high as $6 billion each) has resulted in the Navy planning for only three. If that.
82 posted on 01/31/2008 1:38:40 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blau993

I am not quite sure what exactly this railgun will do. Does it knock out all electrical components of the target or does it silently fire a hunk of metal at 7 mach? Do you know?


83 posted on 01/31/2008 1:38:51 PM PST by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
There's going to be a continuous war between stealth and sensor technology

LIDAR and directed energy weapons are going to make aircraft obsolete.

84 posted on 01/31/2008 1:39:22 PM PST by Centurion2000 (magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: John123

See link @ post # 77


85 posted on 01/31/2008 1:41:07 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; The majority are satisfied with a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

lmao...


86 posted on 01/31/2008 1:41:15 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Until the airborne version of the railgun extends the carriers range again....

I don't deny that carrier could regain dominance, but not by airborne rail guns. Think WWI-WWII; planes didn't dominate supersede battleships by carrying 18-inch guns... Currently, this thing is room sized, it dissipates an extra-oridnary amount of heat, and it requires the kind of energy that only a large ship could provide-- sort of analogous to the 14 inch gun of the WWI era, if you will. Aircraft may find a way to beat this, but probably not by outgunning it, and it will probably take a bit of time for this to happen.

87 posted on 01/31/2008 1:41:23 PM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Ever since the Battle of Midway, sailors have reluctantly been forced to accept that aircraft win sea battles, not ships.

Poppycock! Give me a U.S. submarine and I'll take on whole surface world. The biggest (and only real threat given a good team) to a submarine is another submarine.

88 posted on 01/31/2008 1:44:28 PM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

See power point presentation below; it is planned to go exo-atmospheric during mid-course trajectory.


89 posted on 01/31/2008 1:45:14 PM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
...everyone looking around for a blown up suicide bomber?

No messy brains to clean up..........

90 posted on 01/31/2008 1:45:24 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; RightWhale

Drat! I got the ‘page couldn’t be displayed’ edit. Must be getting lots of hits on that link!


91 posted on 01/31/2008 1:46:17 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Exactly!


92 posted on 01/31/2008 1:46:40 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Until the airborne version of the railgun extends the carriers range again....

From the Navy Powerpoint, the naval gun will shoot a 10 kg projectile at 2.5 km/sec. The recoil on that sucker would be a bit much for an airframe

What they want is an indirect-fire capability where the projectile is fired up in a sub-orbital trajectory at mach 7.5, and comes down up to 200 miles away at mach 5, with a 5 minute flight time

93 posted on 01/31/2008 1:47:17 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Just use a Dirt Devil and your through!..............


94 posted on 01/31/2008 1:47:56 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

The threat of removing the Red Bull stash from the bunker fridge outta cut that stuff down to none.


95 posted on 01/31/2008 1:49:16 PM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
I would dare hope it could make nuclear warheads obsolete.

It has its, uses however, unfortunately no. The energy release from this is minuscule compared to even a small thermonuclear weapon.
96 posted on 01/31/2008 1:49:50 PM PST by zencat (The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: MrB
"...run by 3-6 videogame jocks"


98 posted on 01/31/2008 1:50:04 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

No no no ... you dont get it ... this gun CREATES carbon credits, by stopping the exhalation of greenhouse gasses like CO2 at the point of impact. The US govt is going to become an exporter or carbon credits. Once a dem is in office, then freelancers will even let you ... for a few dollars more ... order carbon credits with a specific point of origin. /sarc but not really


99 posted on 01/31/2008 1:53:39 PM PST by RainMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
No way unless this thing is aimed to escape the atmosphere is it going to coast 200 miles and still be going Mach 5

It will be suborbital and spend most of its flight path outside the atmosphere

100 posted on 01/31/2008 1:54:19 PM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson