1 posted on
01/31/2008 5:57:26 AM PST by
jdm
To: jdm
Hill vs. Walmart is sooo last year. There’s much worse dirt on her than that.
2 posted on
01/31/2008 5:59:57 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: jdm
Let the employees unionize, receive outrageous concessions, and watch the prices soar. They'll end up hurting the people who make the store successful. In the end, however, it will ultimately be blamed on Wal-Mart. After all...how dare they try to make a profit.
5 posted on
01/31/2008 6:05:42 AM PST by
edpc
(Republican Attack Machine Field Service Technician)
To: jdm
Hillary has attempted to parry criticism of her Wal-Mart connection by claiming that she did what she could to press for positive change while on the board.Isn't this the clintonian answer for FAILURE?
They're always "claiming they did what the could to press for positive change."
This should tell us all that we need to know about clintons:CLINTONS ARE FAILURES.
They belong to the sect of "I did my best, so I deserve a medal, too."
6 posted on
01/31/2008 6:05:44 AM PST by
bannie
(clintons CHEAT! AAAALLWAYS!)
To: jdm
Will Hillary's Wal-Mart Experience Trip Her Up? No.
8 posted on
01/31/2008 6:15:57 AM PST by
pnh102
To: jdm
they have to compete for labor in what has been for years a very tight market, Hmmm. tight market for labor.
That almost makes it sound like there has been low unemployment for years now.
Nah, couldn't be.
9 posted on
01/31/2008 6:25:18 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: jdm
10 posted on
01/31/2008 6:38:01 AM PST by
IrishMike
(Liberalism is Jihad from within)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson