Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeniVidiVici
Even if being homosexual is genetic it’s genitically incorrect, an abberation.

Your willful, commonsense and entirely logical statement may cause you to be prosecuted under Hate Crime statutes.

Why are scientists willing to pollute the species by perpetuating a genetic defect?

Because they are able to get grant money to do it, journals will publish their white papers on the subject and provide subsequent career enhancement, and they get invited to all of the 'right' cocktail parties.

 Isn’t there any ethics against that?

Ethics are politically-incorrect.

For all we know homosexuality is on the Darwinian downside and will vanish in the future.

It would indeed vanish a whole lot faster if it were not for the fact that it's being propped up by Governments and sympathetic "scientists".

35 posted on 01/30/2008 10:34:36 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Stoat

It is not genetic. If it was then identical twins would always both be gay 100% of the time. They are not. If one is gay, there’s a 50% chance the other will be. The fact they are not 100% of the time, but a much lower 50% of the time, proves it is not merely genetic. Plus self testimony from lesbians and gays who admit making a conscious choice to be a homosexual.


39 posted on 01/30/2008 10:45:10 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson